Environment and Interdisciplinary Development

Effect of GSCM on Environmental Collaboration and Sustainability Performance Using Factors Analysis and Decision Making Techniques

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Mehdi Ajalli 1
Abbas Nasisri 2
Hassan Hedayati 3

1 Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

2 Department of Management, Faculty of Management, Accounting and Economic, Zanjan Branch of Isamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran

3 Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Rasht Branch of Isamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22034/envj.2022.309177.1147
Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of green supply chain management operations (green procurement, green production, green distribution, green logistics (on environmental cooperation and sustainable performance) economic, social, and environmental (in the country's technology petrochemical company. Literature and research background, a conceptual model of the relationship between these structures was presented, and then the path analysis approach was used to examine the relationship between them. The statistical population of the study consists of 55 experts and specialists of the company due to limited size the population was used as a sample of all members. The research method is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive in terms of data collection method. The output of the Path Analysis showed that: "Green supply chain management operations have a positive effect on" performance "Sustainability" and "environmental cooperation" as well as "environmental cooperation has a positive effect on the performance of sustainability in Fanavaran Petrochemical Company". The output of SWARA technique indicates that the "environmental criterion" with the most weight has been identified as the most important performance measure of sustainability in evaluating suppliers. "Economic criteria" and "social criteria" were also ranked next in importance. Finally, using VIKOR technique, seven suppliers of the company's materials were evaluated and the suppliers were ranked in terms of sustainability performance. The findings of this study are especially useful for manufacturing companies in developing environmental cooperation with their suppliers in order to achieve sustainable performance.

Keywords

GSCM
Environmental Collaboration
Sustainability Performance
Path Analysis
SWARA
VIKOR

Subjects

  1. اجلی، م.، صابری‌فرد، ن. و بابک، ز. 1400. ارزیابی و رتبه‌بندی عوامل رفتاری مؤثر در اجرای موفق مدیریت زنجیره تأمین سبز، نشریه علمی اندیشه آماد، شماره 76 (بهار)، سال بیستم.
  2. اصغری‌زاده، ع. و محمدی‌بالانی، ع. 1396. تکنیک‌های تصمیم‌گیری چندشاخصه، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
  3. امانی، م.،، اشرفی ا. و دهقانان، ح. 1396. "موانع پذیرش زنجیره تأمین سبز با استفاده از تکنیک دیمتل فازی"، فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات سال پنجم، شماره 91، صفحات 179-147.
  4. تقی‌زاده­یزدی، م.، امراللهی­بیوکی، ن. و محمدی بالانی، ع. 1395. "سنجش روابط میان عوامل تأثیرگذار بر پیاده‌سازی مدیریت زنجیرة تأمین سبز و رتبه‌بندی شرکت‌های حاضر در زنجیرة تأمین (مطالعة موردی: صنعت کاشی و سرامیک استان یزد)"، مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه تهران، دوره 8، شماره 4، صفحات 574-555.
  5. حسینی، س.ا.، ایرانبان، س.ج. و میرجهان‌مرد، س. ج. 1393. تعیین و اولویت‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر زنجیره تأمین سبز با استفاده از رویکرد تحلیل مسیر، مدیریت تولید و عملیات، دوره پنجم، پیاپی (9)، شماره (2)، پاییز و زمستان.
  6. داوری، ع.، رضازاده، آ. 1393. مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری با نرم‌افزار PLS، چاپ دوم، سازمان انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی.
  7. رستگار، ع.، کشاورز، م.، روحانی‌راد، ش. و روحانی‌راد، ش. 1400. تأملی بر رهبری تحول‌گرای سبز بر رفتارهای شهروندی زیست‌محیطی با نقش میانجی باورهای زیست‌محیطی و خط مشی‌های سبز، مجله محیط‌زیست و توسعه فرابخشی، دوره 6، شماره 72، صفحات 36-23.
  8. صفری، ح.، خان‌محمدی، ا.، 1395. روش‌های تصمیم‌گیری چندشاخصه فازی، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
  9. فروغی‌فر، ج. و ارغیش، ا. 1399. ارزیابی عملکرد یکپارچگی زنجیره تامین لارج با رویکرد پرامتی و تحلیل عاملی در شرکت‌های سازنده خودروی آتش‌نشانی سنگین کار صنعت؛ کنفرانس بین‌المللی مدل‌ها و تکنیک‎های کمی در مدیریت.
  10. فلاح لاجیمی، ح.، عرب، ع. و بهرام‌زاده، ه. 1395. "بررسی موانع پیاده‌سازی زنجیرة تأمین سبز در صنایع فولاد استان مازندران با رویکرد ترکیبی BSC/BWM"، مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه تهران، دوره 8، شماره 4، صفحات 684-653.
  11. فولادی ف. و خاکستری م.، 1399. ارایه مدل یکپارچه انتخاب تأمین‌کننده سبز در زنجیره‌تأمین ناب- چابک، مجله تحقیق در عملیات در کاربردهای آن، دوره ۱۷، شماره ۳، صفحات 81-97.
  1. Aghdaie M. H., Zolfani Hashemkhani S., Derakhti A., Zavadskas E. K., and Morshed Varzandeh M. H. 2013. “Decision making on business issues with foresight perspective; An application of new hybrid MCDM model in shopping mall locating,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 40, no. 17, pp: 7111–7121.
  2. Ajalli M., Saberifard N., Zinati B. 2021. Evaluation and Ranking the Resilient Suppliers with the Combination of Decision Making Techniques, Management and Production Engineering Review, Volume 12, Number 3, September, pp: 129–140, DOI: 10.24425/mper.2021.137685.
  3. Cho, M., Bonn, M. A., Giunipero, L. and Jaggi, J. S. 2021 “Supplier selection and partnerships: Effects upon restaurant operational and strategic benefits and performance.” International Journal of hospitality management 94: 102781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102781.
  4. Chopra, S, Meindl, P. 2010. Supply chain management: strategy, planning, and 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
  5. Depczyński, R. 2021. MCDA based approach to supplier evaluation –steel industry enterprise case study, 25th International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems, Procedia Computer Science Volume 192, pp: 5081-5092, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.286.
  6. Dyer, J.H, Singh, H. 1998. The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of inter organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review; 23 pp: 660-679.
  7. Flammer, G. 2013. Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: the environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal; 56(3) pp: 758-781.
  8. Holt, D., Ghobadian, A. 2009. An empirical study of green supply chain management practices amongst UK manufacturers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management; 20(7) pp: 933-956.
  9. Ivanov, D., Tsipoulanidis, A. and Schönberger, J. 2019. Global Supply Chain and Operations Management, A Decision-Oriented Introduction to the Creation of Value, Publisher: Springer International Publishing, ISBN: 978-3-319-94312-1; 978-3-319-94313-8.
  10. Keršuliene, V., Zavadskas, E. K. and Turskis, Z. 2010. Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), pp: 243-258.
  11. Kuei, C., Madu, C., Chow, W., & Chen, Y. Determinants and Associated Performance Improvement of Green Supply Chain Mana gement in China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 95, pp: 163-173.
  12. Mohammed, A., Harris, I., Soroka, A., Mohamed, N. and Ramjaun, T. 2018. Evaluating Green and Resilient Supplier Performance: AHP-Fuzzy Topsis Decision-Making Approach, ICORES 2018 - 7th International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems
  13. Paulraj, A. 2011. Understanding the relationships between internal resources and capabilities, sustainable supply management and organizational Journal of Supply Chain Management; 47(1), pp: 19-37.
  14. Rao, P. 2006. Greening of suppliers/in-bound logistics – In the South East Asian Context. Greening the Supply Chain; pp: 189-204.
  15. Rezaei, J., Nispeling, T., Sarkis, J. and Tavasszy, L. A. 2016 “A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method.” Journal of cleaner production 135 pp: 577-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.125.
  16. Sindhwani, R., Mittal, V.K., Singh, P.L., Aggarwal, A., Gautam, N. 2019, Modelling and analysis of barriers affecting the implementation of lean green agile manufacturing system (LGAMS). Benchmarking Int. J. 26 (2), 498–529. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-09- pp: 2017-0245.
  17. Songa, W., Xub, Z. and Liu, H-C. 2017. Developing sustainable supplier selection criteria for solar airconditioner manufacturer: An integrated approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 79, pp: 1461–1471.
  18. Srivastava, S.K. 2007. Green supply chain management: a state of the art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), pp: 53-80.
  19. Thoo, A.C, Abdul Hamid, A.B, Rasli, A. and Zhang, D. 2014. The moderating effect of enviropreneurship on green supply chain management practices and sustainability performance. Advanced Materials Research, Sustainable Development of Industry and Economy; pp: 869-870.
  20. Thoo, A. C., Huam, H. T., Zuraidah, S. 2015. Green Supply Chain Management, Environmental Collaboration and Sustainability Performance, Procedia CIRP 26, pp: 695–699.
  21. Uchida, T, Ferraro, P.J. 2007; Voluntary development of environmental management systems: motivations and regulatory implication. Journal of Regulatory Economics 32(1) pp: 37-65.
  22. Uygun, Ö. and Dede, A. 2016. Performance evaluation of green supply chain management using integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making techniques, Computers & Industrial Engineering 102, pp: 502–511.
  23. Zolfani, S. H., Chen, I. S., Rezaeiniya, N., & Tamošaitienė, J. 2012. A hybrid MCDM model encompassing AHP and COPRAS-G methods for selecting company supplier in Iran. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(3), pp: 529-543.
Environment and Interdisciplinary Development
Volume 6, Issue 74
Winter 2022
Pages 60-77

Home

Submit Manuscript

Contact Us