Environmental Attitudes of Managers and Competitive Advantage: The Role of Environmental Management Accounting and Green Production

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Accounting, Baft Higher Education Complex, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

2 Department of Business Management, Baft Higher Education Complex, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

3 Department of Business Management, Faculty of Mnagenet and Accounting, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
Introduction: In the contemporary world, the environmental attitudes of senior managers are recognized as key factors in the success of organizations and the realization of environmental sustainability. Managers who adopt a proactive approach to environmental preservation will institutionalize competitive advantage and reputation in green product design, supply chain management, ecological branding, environmental accounting and disclosure, and product life cycle management. In this context, a deep understanding of the impact of environmental attitudes on organizational behaviors and strategic decision-making can lead to identifying solutions to improve the environmental and competitive performance of organizations. Accordingly, the aim of this research is to analyze the impact of senior managers' environmental attitudes on environmental management accounting and green production strategy to achieve a green competitive advantage in organizations. This study uses upper management theory as a framework to analyze the behaviors of senior managers and examines their psychological impacts on strategic decision-making. This research is the first study to investigate the relationship between CEOs' attitudes toward the environment, the choice of green production strategy, the implementation of environmental management accounting, and green competitive advantage within the framework of a single study in Iran. Additionally, the moderating role of regulatory pressures is considered in the two relationships: the attitude of managers toward the environment with the choice of green production strategy, and the attitude of managers toward the environment with the implementation of environmental management accounting.
Materials and Methods: This research is descriptive-correlational and survey-based, aiming to examine the impact of senior managers' attitudes on environmental management accounting, green production strategy, and competitive advantage. Data were collected through a 25-question questionnaire based on a Likert scale. The statistical population of the research includes senior managers of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange or over-the-counter market in 2024, classified into 14 groups based on the severity of pollution and other environmental issues according to Article 2 of the regulations for the establishment of industrial and production units approved on 29/03/2011, comprising 436 companies. To assess the validity of the questionnaire, both ordinary content validity and construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis were employed. To evaluate the reliability of the questionnaire, Cronbach's alpha method was used, confirming the reliability of the questionnaires. Data analysis was performed using SPSS and Smart PLS software.
Ressults: The findings of the research indicate that there is a significant positive relationship between senior managers' attitudes toward the environment and green production strategy, the implementation of environmental management accounting, and green competitive advantage.
Discussion: Senior managers' positive attitudes toward the environment increase, the willingness to adopt environmental management accounting and green production strategies also increases, resulting in greater competitive advantage. Furthermore, legal pressure as a driving factor can assist in the adoption of sustainable practices and improve environmental performance. Additionally, this research shows that the selection and implementation of green production strategies require an effective and efficient environmental management accounting system to support these strategies. Ultimately, by changing attitudes and increasing awareness of environmental issues, organizations can achieve sustainable competitive advantage and, consequently, contribute to improving their financial and social performance. These findings can guide senior managers to improve organizational performance and create sustainable value by adopting environmental approaches.

Keywords

Subjects

  1. Amir, M. and Chaudhry, N.I., 2019. Linking environmental strategy to firm performance. Journal of Commerce, Society and Science, 13(4), 849-867.
  2. Astuti, P. and Datrini, L., 2021. Green competitive advantage: Examining the role of environmental consciousness and green intellectual capital. Management Science Letters, 11(4), 1141-1152.
  3. Baah, Ch., Opoku, D., Kwasi, I. and Agyabeng, Y., 2021. Examining the correlations between stakeholder pressures, green production practices, firm reputation, environmental and financial performance: Evidence from manufacturing SMEs. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 100-114.
  4. Bansal, P. and Roth, K., 2000. Why companies go green? A model of ecological responsiveness. Academic Management Journal, 43(4), 717-736.
  5. Bresciani, S., Rehman, S.U., Giovando, G. and Alam, G.M., 2023. The role of environmental management accounting and environmental knowledge management practices influence on environmental performance: Mediated-moderated model. Journal of Knowledge Management. 27(4), 896-918.
  6. Cao, C., Tong, X., Chen, Y. and Zhang, Y., 2022. What a top management's environmental awareness affect corporate green competitive advantage: evidence from China. Kybernetes, 51(3), 1250-1279.
  7. Chin, W.W., 2010. How to Write up and Report PLS Snalyses, Handbook of Partial least squares, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 655-690.
  8. Daddi, T., Testa, F., Frey, M. and Iraldo, F., 2016. Exploring the link between institutional pressures and environmental management systems effectiveness: An empirical study. Journal of Environmental Management, 183(3), 647-656.
  9. Dehghani Soltani, M. and Azar, A., 2020. The role of location and intellectual capital in achieving competitive advantage and improving the performance of apparel businesses. Executive management, 12(24), 209-239. (In Persian)
  10. Dragomir, V.D., 2020. Theoretical aspects of environmental strategy. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 1-31.
  11. Ghafari Ashtiyani, D. and Ghiyasabadi Farahani, M., 2017. Investigating the determinants of environmentally friendly strategy on green competitive advantage and green export performance. Business Management Journal, 35, 124-139. (In Persian)
  12. Gunarathne, N. and Lee, K., 2021. Corporate cleaner production strategy development and environmental management accounting: A contingency theory perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 308, 127402.
  13. Gunarathne, N., Lee, K. and Hitigala, P.K., 2021. Institutional pressures, environmental management strategy, and organizational performance: The role of environmental management accounting. Business Strtegy and Environment, 30(2), 825-839.
  14. Hambrick, D.C. and Mason, P.A., 1984. Upper echelons: The organizations as a reflection of its top manager. Academy Management Research, 9(2), 193-206.
  15. He, Y., Liu, F., Gao, H. and Zhang, H., 2007. Process planning support system for green manufacturing and its application. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2(1), 104-109.
  16. Karamshahi, B., 2023. The Effect of Management Accounting Practice on Corporate Sustainability: The Role of the Moderating Variable of Organizational Characteristics. Auditing Knowledge, 21(93), 67-97. (In Persian)
  17. Kuo, F., Fang, W. and Lepage, B.A., 2022. Proactive environmental strategies in the hotel industry: eco-innovation, green competitive advantage, and green core competence. Journal of Sustanable Tourism, 30(6), 1240-1261.
  18. Lăzăroiu, G., Ionescu, L., Uță, C., Hurloiu, I., Andronie, M. and Dijmărescu, I., 2020. Environmentally responsible behavior and sustainability policy adoption in green public procurement. Sustainability, 12(5), 2110.
  19. Li, X., Wang, N., Jiang, B. and Jia, T., 2023. Institutional pressures and proactive environmental strategy: The mediating effect of top managerial environment attitude and the moderating effect of new media pressure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(8), 6106-6123.
  20. Liem, V.T., 2021. The impact of education background on using cost management system information. Cogent Business Management, 8(1), 1944011.
  21. Liem, V.T. and Hien, N.N., 2024. The impact of managers’ attitudes towards environmental management accounting and green competitive advantage in Vietnam manufacturers. Heliyon, 10, 1-15.
  22. Liem, V.T. and Hien, N.N., 2020.  The impact of manager’s demographic characteristics on prospector strategy, use of management accounting systems and financial performance, Journal of International Studis, 13 (4), 54–69.
  23. Rajabi, H., Tajik, Z. and Ramazan Zadeh, M.M., 2022. The effect of intellectual capital on competitive advantage with regard to the mediating role of intra-organizational problems and the moderating role of knowledge management heterogeneity. Quality Standard Management, 11(3), 159-189. (In Persian)
  24. Ritter, A., Borchardt, M., Vaccaro, G., Pereira, G. and Almeida, F., 2015. Motivations for promoting the consumption of green products in an emerging country: exploring attitudes of Brazilian consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 507-520.
  25. Sari, R.N., Pratadina, A., Anugerah, R., Kamaliah, K. and Sanusi, Z.M., 2021. Effect of environmental management accounting practices on organizational performance: role of process innovation as a mediating variable. Business Process Management Journal, 27(4), 1296-1314.
  26. Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R., Zvezdov, D., Hörisch, J. and Tingey-Holyoak, J., 2015. Management Roles and Sustainability Information. Exploring Corporate Practice. Australian Accounting Review, 25(4), 328-345.
  27. Song, M., Wang, Sh. and Zhang, H., 2020. Could environmental regulation and R&D tax incentives affect green product innovation? Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120849.
  28. Tashakor, S., Appuhami, R. and Munir, R., 2019. Environmental management accounting practices in Australian cotton farming: The use of the theory of planned behaviour. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(4), 1175–1202.
  29. Van Der Poll, H.M., 2022. The barriers and drivers of environmental management accounting practices' adoption in developed and developing countries for sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 30(5), 1222-1234.
  30. Wang, S., Wang, H. and Wang, J., 2019. Exploring the effects of institutional pressures on the implementation of environmental management accounting: do top management support and perceived benefit work? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 233-243.