Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Planning and Design of the Environment, Environmental Science Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Today, with the rapid growth of the economy and the development of urban communities, we are witnessing an intensification of the conflict between the resources used by humans. Therefore, awareness of the capacity of available resources in order to achieve the goals of planning is an undeniable necessity. On the other hand, the increasing trend of pollutant production is a major challenge in the planning process. Therefore, in this study, in addition to examining the resources available at the urban level, human-produced pollutants are also considered. Among these, water resources and the pressure applied to water resources are considered as a key factor. This helps to form strategies for achieving sustainable development. This helps to form strategies for achieving sustainable development. In this research, we try to describe the range of Urban environment carrying capacity Condition the province based on resources as a basis for construction and management of residential areas, which means sustainable housing. In fact, assessing the carrying  capacity of urban environment resources leads to awareness of sustainability and increases the link between human activities and urban sustainability. Due to the high importance of resources in the issue of sustainability and the existing and increasing problems of Tehran province, in this study we have tried to estimate the carrying capacity of the province with emphasis on water resources of the province. In this study, the criteria are divided into two groups of carrier and load. Carriers have been studied from three dimensions of water facilities, water supply and environmental and the load caused by human activity in the sectors of water consumption and production wastewater, socio-economic and pollution in the two sectors of waste and air. Shannon entropy method has been used to weight the indices. Finally, using the interaction of loads to carriers, the carrying  capacity of Tehran province was estimated. According to the obtained results and with the available reports related to the existing conditions in Tehran province, it was determined that among the indicators related to water supply carrier, which has been considered as a key factor in this study, The groundwater resources index, the value of which is determined by the weight of 0.0086, is the most important. According to the results of the carrying capacity related to the interaction of loads with carriers, respectively, carriers of water resources with the amount of 23.748 the highest available capacity, then carriers of the environment of 6.5663 and finally carriers of water facilities as the lowest capacity of Tehran province. There are three carriers with a value of 3.7092.Finally, the numerical value of the total carrying capacity of Tehran province based on the specified indicators is 34.0235. In future studies, if the data and information related to other provinces are completed by implementing the method used in this study for other provinces, it will be possible to compare the values of carrying capacity at the national level, The results can help to improve the planning process based on comparisons between provinces.

Keywords

  1. Akotia, J., Sackey, E. 2018. Towards the delivery of sustainable regeneration projects’ types in the UK: an exploration of the role and level of involvement of key practitioners.The international journal of construction management 18, 375–384.
  2. Antrop, M. 1998. Landscape change: plan or chaos? Landsc. Urban Plan. 41, 155–161.
  3. Bamgbade, J.A., Kamaruddeen, A.M., Nawi, M.N.M., Yusoff, R.Z., Bin, R.A. 2018. Does government support matter? Influence of organizational culture on sustainable construction among Malaysian contractors. The international journal of construction management 18, 93–107.
  4. Chen, J. 2007. Rapid urbanization in China: a real challenge to soil protection and food security.Catena 69, 1–15.
  5. Fang, H., Gan, S., Xue, C. 2019. Evaluation of regional water resources carrying capacity based on binary index method and reduction index method, S1674-2370(19)30129-2, Journal Pre-proof.
  6. Feng, Z., Sun, T., Yang, Y., Yan, H. 2018. The progress of resources and environment carryingcapacity: from single-factor carrying capacity research to comprehensive research.Journal of Resources and Ecology 9, 125–134.
  7. Gao, J., O’Neill, B.C. 2020. Mapping global urban land for the 21st century with data-driven simulations and Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Nat. Commun. 11 https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15788-7.
  8. General results of the General Census of Population and Housing, 2016. Planning and Budget Organization, Management and Planning Organization of Tehran Province, Deputy of Statistics and Information, 2016.
  9. Han, X., Liu, Y., Gao, H., Ma, J., Mao, X., Wang, Y., Ma, X. 2017. Forecasting PM2.5 inducedmale lung cancer morbidity in China using satellite retrieved PM2.5 and spatial analysis.Sci. Total Environ. 607, 1009–1017.
  10. Hao, Y., Xu, Y., Zhang, J., Hu, X., Huang, J., Chang, C.P., Guo, Y. 2019. Relationship betweenforest resources and economic growth: empirical evidence from China. J. Clean. Prod.214, 848–859.
  11. httos://www.atlas.d_waste.com
  12. https://waqi.info
  13. https://www.eghtesadnews.com/
  14. Iran Population Census, 2016. National Statistics Center
  15. Jiaa, Z., Caia, Y., Chenb, Y., Zenga, W. Regionalization of water environmental carrying capacity for supporting the sustainable water resources management and development in China, Resources, Conservation & Recycling 134, 282–293.
  16. Keshtkar, M., Sayahnia, R. 2021. Monitoring the Ecological Security of Esfahan with an Ecosystem Service Approach. Geography and Sustainability of Environment, 10 (4), 1-107.
    doi:10.22126/GES.2021.5975.2329.
  17. Lane, M., Dawes, L., Grace, P. 2014. The essential parameters of a resource-based carrying capacity assessment model: an Australian case study. Ecol. Model. 272, 220–231.1468-1474.
  18. Larsen, T.A., Gujer, W. 1997. The concept of sustainable urban water management. Water SciTechnol. 35, 3–10.
  19. Latifi, G., Basatian, S.M. 2012. Security Consequences of Centralism in Tehran, Journal of Cultural Sociology, Vol.
  20. Liao a, S., Wub, Y., Wai Wong c, S., Shen a, L. 2020. Provincial perspective analysis on the coordination between urbanization growth and resource environment carrying capacity (RECC) in China, Science of the Total Environment 730, 138964.
  21. Liu, R., Borthwick, A.G. 2011. Measurement and assessment of carrying capacity of theenvironment in Ningbo, China. J. Environ. Manag. 92, 2047–2053.
  22. Liu, X., Guo, C., He, S., Zhu, H., Li, J., Yu, Z., Qi, Y., He, J., Zhang, J., Müller, C. 2020. Divergent gross nitrogen transformation paths in the topsoil and subsoil between abandoned and agricultural cultivation land in irrigated areas. Sci. Total Environ. 716, 137148 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137148.
  23. Management and Planning Organization of Tehran Province, 1398. Deputy of Statistics and Information.
  24. Meng, C., Du, X., Ren, Y., Shen, L., Cheng, G., Wang, J. 2020. Sustainable urban development: An examination of literature evolution on urban carrying capacity in the Chinese context, Journal Pre-proof, JCLP 122802.
  25. Omidpour, M., Sayahnia, R., Rezaei, Y. 2020. The Impact of Urban Growth and Development Trend on Ecological Network Structure with Resilience and Landscape Approach (Case study of Hamedan). Iranian Journal of Remote Sensing & GIS, 12(2), 19-32. doi: 10.52547/gisj.12.2.19
  26. Ostroumov, S. 2005. On some issues of maintaining water quality and self-purification. Water Resources 32, 305–313.
  27. Peixoto, J.P., Oort, A.H., De Almeida, M., Tomé, A. 1991. Entropy budget of the atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 96, 10981–10988
  28. Sajjadi Ghaemmaghami, S.S., Sayahnia, R., Mobarghei Dinan, N., Makhdoum Farkhondeh, M. 2021. Evaluating the implications of urban growth on carbon fixation ecosystem services (Case study: Karaj Subcatchments). Journal of RS and GIS for Natural Resources, 12(1), 20-37.
  29. Salehi, I. 2011. Environmental planning and design of security in the urban environment, Publications of the Organization of Municipalities and Rural Affairs.
  30. Sasanpour, F. 2011. Principles of Sustainability of metropolitan development with emphasis on Tehran metropolis, Tehran Planning Studies Center, Tehran.
  31. Saveriades, A. 2000. Establishing the Social Tourism Carrying Capacity for the Tourist Resorts of the East Coast of the Republic of Cyprus, Tourism Management, 21.
  32. Sayahnia, R., Makhdoum, M., Faryadi, S. 2017. (Ecological indices in evaluation of urban development capability (case study: Tehran metropolitan area. Environmental Sciences, 15(1), 77-88.
  33. Sayahnia, R., Sobhani, P., Mahmoudi, H., Esmaeilzadeh, H. 2019. Estimation of the tourism carrying capacity in protect areas (Case study: Alvand No-Hunting Area). Journal of Tourism Planning and Development, 8(30), 51-64. doi: 10.22080/jtpd.2019.16240.3037
  34. Shena,b, L., Shua,b, T.,* Liaoa,b, X., Yanga,b, Y., Renc, M., Zhua,b, G., Chenga,b, N., Wanga,b. J. 2020. A new method to evaluate urban resources environment carrying capacity from the load-and-carrier perspective, Resources, Conservation & Recycling 154 104616.
  35. Sobhani, P., Sayahnia, R., Mahmoudi, H., Esmaeilzadeh, H. 2020. Estimation of the tourism carrying capacity in protect areas (Case study: Alvand No-Hunting Area). Journal of Tourism Planning and Development. Volume 8, Issue 30.Pages 51-64
  36. Statistics of Tehran, Statistical Yearbook of Tehran, 2019. Tehran Municipality Information and Communication Technology Organization.
  37. Statistical report of hospital statistics and information system (Avab), 2017. Office of Hospital Management and Clinical Services Excellence.
  38. Statistical Yearbook of the Country, 2018. Country Planning and Budget Organization, Statistics Center of Iran, Publication Date: First Edition, May 2020.
  39. Sun a,b,*, M., Wang a,b, J., He a, K. 2020. Analysis on the urban land resources carrying capacity during urbanization-A case study of Chinese YRD, Applied Geography 116, 102170.
  40. UN, D. E. S. A. 2019. World urbanization prospects: The 2018 revision. Retrieved from https://population.un.org/wup/ Publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf.
  41. UN ECOSOC. 2019. Special edition: Progress towards the sustainable development goals. Retrieved from https://undocs.org/E/2019/68
  42. United Nations, 2018. Department of economic and social affairs. May 16. United Nations. Retrieved February 19, 2020, from. https://www.un.org/development/ desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html.
  43. Wang, J., Da, L., Song, K., Li, B.-L., 2008. Temporal variations of surface water quality inurban, suburban and rural areas during rapid urbanization in Shanghai, China. Environ.Pollut. 152, 387–393.
  44. Wang, Z.G., Luo, Y.Z., Zhang, M.H., Xia, J. 2014. Quantitative evaluation of sustainable development and eco-environmental carrying capacity in water-deficient regions: a case study in the Haihe river basin, China. J. Integr. Agric. 13 (1), 195–206.
  45. Wanga, J., Renb, Y., Shua, T., Shena, L., Liaoa, X., Yanga, N., Hea, H. 2020. Economic perspective-based analysis on urban infrastructures carrying capacity - A China study, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 83, 106381.
  46. Wang, J., Wei, X., Guo, Q. 2018. A three-dimensional evaluation model for regional carrying capacity of ecological environment to social economic development: model development and a case study in China. Ecol. Indic. 89, 348–355.
  47. Wang, T.X., Xu, S.G. 2015. Dynamic successive assessment method of water environment carrying capacity and its application. Ecol. Indic. 52, 134–146.
  48. Wei, Y., Huang, C., Lam, P.T., Yuan, Z. 2015. Sustainable urban development: a review onurban carrying capacity assessment. Habitat International 46, 64–71.
  49. Wu J.P., Li H., Qian, M. 2011. Groundwater quality in Jingyuan County a semi-humid area in Water Resources Management, 23(12), 2505-2513.
  50. Xian, G., Crane, M., Su, J. 2007. An analysis of urban development and its environmentalimpact on the Tampa Bay watershed. J. Environ. Manag. 85, 965–976.
  51. Yana, R., Gaoa, Y., Lib, L., Gaoa, J. 2019. Estimation of water environmental capacity and pollution load reduction for urban lakeside of Lake Taihu, eastern China, Ecological Engineering 139, 105587.
  52. Yan-sui, L., Xiac, B., Zhaoa, G. 2009. Urban ecological security assessment and forecasting, based on a cellular automata model: A case study of Guangzhou, China, International Journal on Ecological Modelling and Systems Ecology.
  53. Yue, L.P., Hui, Q., Jian-Hu, W. 2010. Groundwater quality assessment based on improved water quality index in Pengyang Country, Ningxia, northwest China. J. Chem., 7(S1), 209-216.
  54. Zhang, Y., Shen, L., Shuai, C., Bian, J., Zhu, M., Tan, Y., Ye, G. 2019. How is the environmental efficiency in the process of dramatic economic development in the Chinese cities? Ecol. Indic. 98, 349–362
  55. Zhang, F., Wang, Y., Ma, X., Wang, Y., Yang, G., Zhu, L. 2019. Evaluation of resources and environmental carrying capacity of 36 large cities in China based on a supportpressure coupling mechanism. Sci. Total Environ. 688, 838–854.
  56. Zhou, Z., Guo, X., Wu, H., Yu, J. 2018. Evaluating air quality in China based on daily data: application of integer data envelopment analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 198, 304–311.
  57. Zhou, X.Y., Lei, K., Meng, W., Khu, S. T., Zhao, J., Wang, M., Yang, J. 2017. Space–time approach to water environment carrying capacity calculation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 302-312.
  58. Zhu, M., Shen, L., Tam, V.W.Y. Liu, Z., Shu, T., Luo, W. 2020. A load-carrier perspective examination on the change of ecological environment carrying capacity during urbanization process in China, Science of the Total Environment 714 -
  59. Zou, Z.H., Yi, Y., Sun, J.N. 2006. Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. J. Environ. Sci. 18, 1020–1023.