Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Esfahan University, Iran

2 Research Group of Environmental Engineering and Pollution Monitoring, Research Center for Environment and Sustainable Development, RCESD, Department of Environment, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran

3 RCESD

Abstract

Abstract
Introduction: Flood is one of the main natural disasters in Iran, which has caused losses in different regions. The ability to produce accurate and timely flood assessments is an important safety tool for flood mitigation and response. Several methodologies have been developed to indicate the risks associated with flooding by using ground measurements. Satellite remote sensing data have been used for flood assessment because of their spatial resolution and capacity to provide information for areas of poor accessibility or lacking in ground measurements. High resolution satellite data is mainly useful for the spatial analysis of water pixels. When flood data (before and after of a flood event) are available, it is possible to classify land cover change, and thus identify which areas are flooded.
Materials and Methods: The present study developed a methodology that uses Sentinel 1 images and global products to assess the losses caused by a flood in the province of Khuzestan (2020) and Chabahar-Konarak (2021-2022). In this study, in addition to Sentinel 1 satellite data, Landsat 8 satellite images have been used. The results of this research have turned into the development of a flood application in the Google Earth Engine software.
Results: The results showed that the use of optically inactive images of this Landsat 8 or Sentinel 2 in cases where the cloud cover does not bother will increase the accuracy of the output. This issue is one of the specialization features in the conditions of uncertainty in determining the thresholds of changes in radar images. In the field of flood zone and subsequently estimation of losses from flood. Applying the method presented in the Google Earth Engine environment, due to the easy access to satellite images and global products, is a suitable solution for extracting the flood zone and subsequently estimating the agricultural and residential damages caused by floods.
Discussion: Combining the information of radar and optical satellites can play an important role in the accuracy of the thresholds and extracting the flood zone. The limitations related to optical images such as cloud cover disturbances led to the use and evaluation of methodology based on radar images (without the use of optical images) in this research.  According to the research methodology, there is no need to prepare and collect land information and global products regarding the population and its spatial distribution, land cover, permanent water areas and the digital elevation model of the land, with appropriate spatial accuracy (all information with spatial accuracy less than 100 meters) has been used.  Fast access to processed satellite images, as well as general coding and processing of images and the implementation of the considered methodology in the Earth-engine environment are the main advantages of this study.

Keywords

  1. Abdolhosseini, M., & Farzaneh, M. R., 2014. Investigation of internal uncertainty sources of change factor method in downscaling of climatic parameters of future period. Intl J Agric Crop Sci7(12), 941-949.
  2. Attia, W., Ragab, D., Abdel-Hamid, A. M., Marghani, A. M., Elfadaly, A., & Lasaponara, R., 2022. On the Use of Radar and Optical Satellite Imagery for the Monitoring of Flood Hazards on Heritage Sites in Southern Sinai, Egypt. Sustainability14(9), 5500.
  3. Bagheri, M.H. and Farzaneh. M.R., 2021. Timely estimation of flood damage using remote sensing in google earth engine (study area: 2020 Khuzestan flood). The 8th Comprehensive Conference on Flood Management and Engineering. Tehran.
  4. Chen, T., Song, C., Zhan, P., Yao, J., Li, Y., & Zhu, J., 2022. Remote sensing estimation of the flood storage capacity of basin-scale lakes and reservoirs at high spatial and temporal resolutions. Science of the Total Environment807, 150772.
  5. DeVries, B., Huang, C., Armston, J., Huang, W., Jones, J.W. and Lang, M.W., 2020. Rapid and robust monitoring of flood events using Sentinel-1 and Landsat data on the Google Earth Engine. Remote Sensing of Environment, 240, p.111664.
  6. Dodange, P., Ebadi, H., & Kayani, A., 2021. Identification of flood areas with time series statistical calculations based on combining radar and optical data. Ecohydrology, 639-623, (3)8.
  7. Fakhri, M., Farzaneh, M. R., Eslamian, S., & Hosseinipour, E. Z., 2011. Uncertainty analysis of downscaled precipitation using LARS-WG statistical model in Shahrekord station, Iran. In World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2011: Bearing Knowledge for Sustainability (pp. 4572-4578).
  8. Fakhri, M., Farzaneh, M. R., Eslamian, S., & Khordadi, M. J., 2012. Confidence interval assessment to estimate dry and wet spells under climate change in Shahrekord Station, Iran. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering18(7), 911-8.
  9. Fazeli Farsani, A., Ghazavi, R., & Farzaneh, M. R., 2015. Investigation of land use classification algorithms using images fusion techniques (Case study: Beheshtabad Sub-basin). Journal of RS and GIS for Natural Resources6(1), 91-106.
  10. Ghaffarian, S., Rezaie Farhadabad, A., & Kerle, N., 2020. Post-disaster recovery monitoring with google earth engine. Applied Sciences, 10(13), 4574.
  11. Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., Moore, R., 2017. Google Earth Engine: planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens. Environ.
  12. Hirabayashi, Y., Mahendran, R., Koirala, S., Konoshima, L., Yamazaki, D., Watanabe, S., Kim, H., Kanae, S., 2013. Global flood risk under climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 816–821.
  13. Huang, W., DeVries, B., Huang, C., Jones, J., Lang, M., Creed, I., Carroll, M., 2018. Automated extraction of surface water extent from Sentinel-1 data. Remote Sens. 10, 1–18.
  14. Liu, C.C., Shieh, M.C., Ke, M.S. and Wang, K.H., 2018. Flood prevention and emergency response system powered by Google Earth Engine. Remote sensing, 10(8), p.1283.
  15. Mhawej, M., & Faour, G., 2020. Open-source Google Earth Engine 30-m evapotranspiration rates retrieval: The SEBALIGEE system. Environmental Modelling & Software, 133, 104845.
  16. Moazami, S., Golian, S., Kavianpour, M. R., & Hong, Y., 2014. Uncertainty analysis of bias from satellite rainfall estimates using copula method. Atmospheric Research, 137, 145-166.
  17. Narron, C. R., O'Connell, J. L., Mishra, D. R., Cotten, D. L., Hawman, P. A., & Mao, L., 2022. Flooding in Landsat across Tidal Systems (FLATS): An index for intermittent tidal filtering and frequency detection in salt marsh environments. Ecological Indicators141, 109045.
  18. Nuri, A. Z., Farzaneh, M., & Espanayi, K., 2014. Assessment of climatic parameters uncertainty under effect of different downscaling techniques. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences8(9), 838-225.
  19. Ounrit, I., Sinnung, S., Meena, P., and Laosuwan, T. 2022. FLASH FLOOD MAPPING BASED ON DATA FROM LANDSAT-8 SATELLITE AND WATER INDICES.
  20. Pekel, J.-F., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N., & Belward, A. S., 2016. High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature, 540(7633), 418-422.
  21. Pourghasemi, H.R., Amiri, M., Edalat, M., Ahrari, A.H., Panahi, M., Sadhasivam, N. and Lee, S., 2020. Assessment of urban infrastructures exposed to flood using susceptibility map and Google Earth Engine. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 14, pp.1923-1937.
  22. Rajabzadeh, Y., Ayubzadeh, S. A., and Qomshi, M., 2018. Investigating the flood of Khuzestan province during the water year 2017-2018 presenting its control and management solutions in the future. Ecohydrology, 6(4), 1069-1084.
  23. Soleimani, K., Darvishi, and Shadman., 2020. Zoning and flood risk monitoring in spring 2018 in Khuzestan using Landsat-8 data. Ecohydrology. 662-647, (3)7.
  24. Tamiminia, H., Salehi, B., Mahdianpari, M., Quackenbush, L., Adeli, S., & Brisco, B., 2020. Google Earth Engine for geo-big data applications: A meta-analysis and systematic review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 164, 152-170.
  25. Vanama, V.S.K., Mandal, D. and Rao, Y.S., 2020. GEE4FLOOD: rapid mapping of flood areas using temporal Sentinel-1 SAR images with Google Earth Engine cloud platform. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 14(3), p.034505.
  26. Voigt, S., Giulio-Tonolo, F., Lyons, J., Kučera, J., Jones, B., Schneiderhan, T., Platzeck, G., Kaku, K., Hazarika, M.K., Czaran, L., Li, S., Pedersen, W., James, G.K., Proy, C., Muthike, D.M., Bequignon, J., Guha-Sapir, D., 2016. Global trends in satellite-based
  27. Wing, O.E.J., Bates, P.D., Smith, A.M., Sampson, C.C., Smith, K.A.J., P.M.; J.F.; O.E.J.W.; P.D.B.; C.C.S.; A.M., Fargione, J., Morefield, P., 2018. Estimates of present and future flood risk in the conterminous United States. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 034023.