Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Applied Geology, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

2 Master Student of Chemical Engineering-HSE, Department of Human Environment, College of Environment, Karaj, Iran

3 Research Group of Environmental Engineering and Pollution Monitoring, Research Center for Environment and Sustainable Development, Department of Environment, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: In developing countries, Material Flow Cost Accounting (MFCA) offers numerous benefits, including the identification of hidden costs, waste reduction, improved environmental outcomes, enhanced product quality and competitiveness, and increased process and resource productivity. The zinc mining industry and related activities, such as concentrate production and zinc smelting, require process life cycle analysis due to the extensive pollution they generate, including contamination of surface and underground water from heavy elements in the leachate. Through the use of MFCA modeling, it is possible to accurately evaluate the inputs and outputs of current processes in this field and analyze them for environmental effects.
Materials and Methods: This study involved visits to industrial smelting units, expert opinions, and integration with the Sima Pro software database to prepare a life cycle model and network of the product life cycle and its environmental effects. By analyzing the life cycle of Iran's zinc smelting industry, green product productivity was used to calculate the cost-material flow in the selected sample unit, track the material flow, and present a model for the life cycle of zinc. This involved utilizing information from Iran's zinc smelting industry, data from the Sima Pro software database, and the implementation of the MFCA model on information related to zinc smelting and concentrate products. In this model, zinc smelting and zinc concentrate production processes were treated as input and greenhouse gas emissions as output.




* Corresponding Author’s email: Sarkheil@khu.ac.ir
 
 




Results: Based on the material balance relationship, the combination of calcine with sulfuric acid produces leach cake, silver, lead, and air pollution. The research estimates that for the production of one ton of zinc ingot, the amount of air pollution generated is 7 kg. MFCA analysis of the leaching unit of the industrial research complex indicates that the cost of 5070 kilograms of input materials is 12,350,000 Tomans, the cost of the system is 30,000,000 Tomans, and the cost of energy is 1,950,000 Tomans. The study also found that 3549 kg of product is obtained for 9,100,000 Tomans, while 1536 kg of waste is produced at the cost of 3,250,000 Tomans. This highlights the input values, the primary product, and the secondary product.
Discussion: Through the provision of comprehensive life cycle models for the zinc smelting process, especially the zinc smelting concentrate process, the inputs and outputs of the production chain were evaluated. By accurately determining the flow cost of these materials, the process of zinc smelting concentrate production can be optimized to minimize losses, reduce environmental pollution, lower direct costs, and increase economic output, thereby leading to the growth and development of the industrial complex.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Awuah-Offei, K. and Adekpedjou, A., 2011. Application of life cycle assessment in the mining industry. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 16. 82-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0246-6
  2. Burritt, R.L., Herzig, C., Schaltegger, S. and Viere, T., 2022. Diffusion of environmental management accounting for cleaner production: Evidence from some case studies. J. Clean. Prod., 224, 479–491
  3. Genderen, E. and Wildnauer, M., Santero, N., and Sidi, N., 2016. A global life cycle assessment for primary zinc production. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 21. 10.1007/s11367-016-1131-8.
  4. Chattinnawat, W., Suriya, W. and Jindapanpisan, P., 2018. Application of MFCA with LEAN to improve pajama production process: A case study of Confederate International Co., Ltd. In Accounting for Sustainability: Asia Pacific Perspectives; Lee, K.-H., Schaltegger, S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 209–235. ISBN 978-3-319-70898-0.
  5. Guo, X., Xiao, S., Xiao, X., Li, Q. and Yamamoto. R., 2002. LCA case study for lead and zinc production by an imperial smelting process in China - A brief presentation. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 7. 276-276. 10.1007/BF02978887.
  6. ISO 14040, 2006. Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework, ICS /13/13.020 /13.020.10
  7. ISO 14044, 2006. Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines, ICS/13/13.020/13.020.10
  8. ISO 14051: Manual on Material Flow Cost Accounting, 2014. First published in Japan, Asian Productivity Organization Designed by Expressions, Inc. Printed by Hirakawa Kogyosha Co., Ltd., Japan. P 37. ISBN 978-92-833-2449-2.
  9. Jin, Y., Yu, L. and Wang, Y., 2022. Green Total Factor Productivity and Its Saving Effect on the Green Factor in China’s Strategic Minerals Industry from 1998–2017. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19, 14717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph192214717
  10. Khasreen, M.M., Banfill, P.F.G. and Menzies, G.F., 2009. Life-Cycle Assessment and the Environmental Impact of Buildings: A Review. Sustainability, 1, 674-701.
  11. Kendall, A., 2012. Life Cycle Assessment for Pavement: Introduction. Presentation in Minutes, FHWA Sustainable Pavement Technical Working Group Meeting, April 25-26, 2012, Davis, CA.145−156. 10.5277/ppmp130114.
  12. Mehdilo, A., Irannajad, M. and Zarei, H., 2013. Flotation of zinc oxide ore using cationic and cationic-anionic mixed collectors. Fizykochemiczne Problemy Mineralurgii - Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing. 49.
  13. Pineda-Henson, R. and Culaba, A.B., 2004. Zinc Environmental Profile Life Cycle Assessment: Int J LCA, 9: 379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979081
  14. Magyar, L., 2018. A Review of the Utility of Bayesian Network Models, the University of Akron, spring 2018.
  15. Razeghi, N. and Mobaraghi Dinan, N., 2011. Investigation of environmental effects of mining projects and their evaluation methods, Fifth Specialized Conference on Environmental Engineering, Tehran, University of Tehran, Faculty of Environment. (In Persian).
  16. Sarkheil, H. and Hassani, H., 2009. A new design for geoelectric surveying and inverse 1D and 2D modeling: the case of Karongah lead-zinc mine, 9th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference (SGEM), Bulgaria, 637-641.
  17. Sarkheil, H. and Rahbari, S., 2015. RRR (Reclamation, Remediation, and Recovery): Green Phases of Mining and Drilling Lifecycle Influence on and/or Influenced by Sustainable Development, European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, Vol 4, No 4.
  18. Sabol, A., Sander, M. and Fučkan, D., 2013. The concept of industry life cycle and development of business strategies.
  19. Tachikawa, H., 2014. Manual on Material Flow Cost Accounting: ISO 14051, Asian productivity organization, p. 25. www.apo-tokyo.org
  20. Tran, T.T. and Herzig, C., 2020. Material Flow Cost Accounting in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 12, 5413. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135413
  21. Yu, L. and Jin, Y., 2022. Dynamic characteristics of green development in China’s mining industry and policy implications: From the perspective of firm heterogeneity. Resour. Sci. 2022, 44, 554–569. doi: 18402/resci.2022.03.10