Estimating Environmental Productivity and Its Drivers with an Emphasis on Undesirable Products: an Analysis of Iran's Province Manufacturing Industries

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of Economics, Firoozkooh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Firoozkooh, Iran

Abstract
Introduction: Along with the manufacturing industries development, the sustainable development of this sector should be based on the continuous productivity growth of firms from the point of view of technological progress and efficiency improvement. In the manufacturing sector, product production can be accompanied by undesirable or unfavorable products, such as polluting gases, sewage, solid and liquid wastes, which ignoring them may lead to unbiased productivity and technical changes. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the changes of productivity and environmental efficiency of manufacturing industries in Iran's provinces.
Materials and Method: To achieve the goal of the article, a two-step approach is used. In the first stage, the global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index was measured the consideration of sewage and waste undesirable outputs and was divided into two components, technical efficiency changes and technological progress. In the second stage, the effect of environmental productivity growth drivers was estimated using Tobit, Logit and Probit models. The data of this article were extracted from the reports of the survey plan from industrial firms with 10 or more workers in the period of 2015-2019.
Results: The findings of the first stage state that technological progress is the main contributor to environmental productivity growth in Iran’s manufacturing industries. The average change of environmental productivity has been Also decreased, which shows that the Iran’s provinces manufacturing firms are behind the existing global technology frontier. In our period, the criterion of eco-friendliness showed that 10 provinces were green and 16 were yellow, and the big provinces are also among yellow provinces. The results of the second stage indicate that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between per capita income and environmental productivity growth. Also, the increase in the ratio of capital to employment has led to an increase in the environmental productivity growth; But the increase of energy intensity of manufacturing industries will reduce the environmental productivity.
Discussion: In order to improve environmental productivity, industrial firms can help improve productivity, profit, competitiveness and enhance the quality of human life through evaluating the performance of economic firms, pricing processes of waste and waste of economic resources in the production process, as well as efforts to reduce pollution and harmful effects of the environment. Therefore, by reducing the production inputs consumption for a certain level of production or providing services, the reduction of production costs, the quality and products competitiveness at the national and global level will be improved, and the result will be the improvement of green economic growth. According to the results of the article, some policy recommendations can be suggested. First, the application and development of cleaner technologies and technologies that save energy consumption are the main drivers for the environmental productivity growth and sustainable development of Iran's provinces in the future. Second, considering the relationship between per capita income and the environmental productivity growth and since almost all large provinces such as Tehran and Isfahan are struggling with environmental problems, it is necessary to develop policies to increase industrial concentration in other provinces. In provinces with excessive economic activities such as Tehran, Isfahan and Khuzestan, it is necessary to control the industries density and population in these provinces in order to prevent the spread of pollution and other diseases of big cities that threaten sustainable development.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. Abedi, S., Daneshmand, A. and Noria, S., 2019. Investigating factors affecting on the green productivity growth in Iran's economy. Economic research, 54(3), 633-658. (In Persian with English abstract)
  2. Ananda, J. and Hampf, B., 2015. Measuring environmentally sensitive productivity growth: An application to the urban water sector. Ecological Economics, 116, 211-219.
  3. Arabi, B., Munisamy, S., and Emrouznejad, A. 2015. A new slacks-based measure of Malmquist–Luenberger index in the presence of undesirable outputs. Omega, 51, 29-37.
  4. Chambers, R.G., Chung, Y. and Färe, R., 1996. Benefit and distance functions. Journal of economic theory, 70(2), 407-419.
  5. Chen, S. and Golley, J., 2014. Green productivity growth in China's industrial economy. Energy Economics, 44, 89-98.
  6. Chung, Y.H., Färe, R. and Grosskopf, S., 1997. Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 51(3), 229-240.
  7. Cohen-Rosenthal, E. and Musnikow, J., 2017. What is eco-industrial development? In Eco-Industrial Strategies (pp. 14-29). Routledge.
  8. Dashti, Q., Sani, F., Qahremanzade, M. and Sani, R., 2019. Total factor productivity growth decomposition and measuring in the dairy industry of Iran. Animal science research (agricultural knowledge), 29(1), 61-76. (In Persian with English abstract)
  9. Fan, M., Shao, S. and Yang, L., 2015. Combining global Malmquist–Luenberger index and generalized method of moments to investigate industrial total factor CO2 emission performance: A case of Shanghai (China). Energy Policy, 79, 189-201.
  10. Färe, R. and Grosskopf, S., 2010. Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency. European journal of operational research, 200(1), 320-322.
  11. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. and Pasurka Jr, C.A., 2007. Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions. Energy, 32(7), 1055-1066.
  12. Fathabadi, M. and Sofimajidpour, M., 2018. Higher education, technical efficiency and total productivity changes: Evidences of Iran's manufacturing industries. Research and planning in higher education, 24(2), 27-51. (In Persian with English abstract)
  13. Fathabadi, M., 2017. Intellectual capital, total productivity and technical efficiency changes: Evidence of Iran's insurance industry. Economic growth and development research, 8(29), 145-156. (In Persian with English abstract)
  14. Fukuyama, H. and Weber, W.L., 2009. A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 43(4), 274-287.
  15. Haqiqatpishe, H., Kordrostami, S. and Amirteymori, A., 2021. The highest scale of production efficiency with the presence of environmental factors in data envelopment analysis. New researches in mathematics, 7(31), 185-204. (In Persian with English abstract)
  16. Homaian, M. and Aqapoursabaqi, M., 2018. Calculating environmentally compatible productivity in the agricultural sector. Natural environment (Iran’s natural resources), 71(2), 255-268. (In Persian with English abstract)
  17. Iran Statistics Center (various years). Statistical data and information, industry and mining sector, statistical tables, statistics plan from industrial firms of 10 workers and more. https://www.amar.org.ir/
  18. Mahmodzade, M. and Fathabadi, M., 2016. Driving factors of total factor productivity in Iran's manufacturing industries. Economic modeling research, 26(4), 141-165. (In Persian with English abstract)
  19. Mashayekhi, B., Hojabrkiani, K., Khalili, F. and Asgari, F., 2021. Investigating the effect of information and communication technology and foreign direct investment on green productivity in Iran. Environmental science and technology, 23(1), 253-266. (In Persian with English abstract)
  20. Oh, D.H., 2010. A global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index. Journal of productivity analysis, 34(3), 183-197.
  21. Parsa, P., Sadeqi, Z. and Jalaei esfandabadi, S., 2015. Environmental productivity growth Decomposition using the distance function in the provinces of Iran. Iranian applied economic studies, 4(16), 1-24. (In Persian with English abstract)
  22. Pastor, J.T. and Lovell, C.K., 2005. A global Malmquist productivity index. Economics Letters, 88(2), 266-271.
  23. Sofimajidpour, M. and Isazadeh, S., 2017. Total factor productivity growth, technological progress and efficiency changes: empirical evidence from Iran's manufacturing industries. Economic modeling, 11, 4(40), 29-48. (In Persian with English abstract)
  24. Wang, X., Ding, H. and Liu, L., 2019. Eco-efficiency measurement of industrial sectors in China: A hybrid super-efficiency DEA analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 53-64.
  25. Wang, Y. and Shen, N., 2016. Environmental regulation and environmental productivity: The case of China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 758-766.
  26. Wang, Z. and Feng, C., 2015. Sources of production inefficiency and productivity growth in China: a global data envelopment analysis. Energy Economics, 49, 380-389.
  27. Wooldridge, J.M., 2015. Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Cengage learning.
  28. Yang, L., and Zhang, X. 2018. Assessing regional eco-efficiency from the perspective of resource, environmental and economic performance in China: A bootstrapping approach in global data envelopment analysis. Journal of cleaner production, 173, 100-111.
  29. Zhu, L. and He, F., 2022. A multi-stage Malmquist-Luenberger index to measure environmental productivity in China's iron and steel industry. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 103, 162-175.