Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: The declining trend of non-renewable resources and the damage caused to the climate in this century has caused many concerns in terms of economic growth and progress. Strengthening economic growth is achieved in parallel with the increasing consumption of energy, and high energy consumption causes the release and increase in the concentration of all kinds of pollutants that are harmful to the environment, for this reason, the topics of economic growth and how to create a balance between growth and environmental quality are very important. One of the important tools to investigate this question is to pay attention to the environmental curve of Kuznets. This review is also important in the micro sector and the same macroeconomic results cannot be used for other sub-sectors. For this reason, in this study, this curve has been investigated and extracted for each of the economic sub-sectors.
Materials and Methods: The present study aims to measure the effects of economic growth on the environment. The research variables include the country's GDP per capita as an indicator of economic growth and CO2 emission per capita as an indicator to show the level of environmental degradation. The data of the study has been collected at the level of three main sectors for the economy of Iran in the period of 2010-2016. This research will first create an econometric relationship (Co-Integration) between the mentioned variables in each of the three sections and then present the applied form of EKC.
Results: The results of the study confirm the long-run Co-integration relationship between the research variables in the agricultural and industrial sectors, but the dependent form of the Kuznets curve is not confirmed in these sectors. The results show that there is no long-run Co-integration association in the service sector. Also, the error correction coefficients in each of the agricultural and industrial sectors state that 6 and 1 percent of each period's error is corrected in moving to the long-run Steady equilibrium, respectively.
Discussion: Based on the findings of the research and relying on the logic of the Kuznets curve based on the positive correlation between economic growth variables (income) and pollutant emissions (energy consumption) at low income levels and negative correlation at high income levels, in each of the agricultural and industrial sectors, Economic growth is accompanied by the production of more pollutants and more destruction of the environment, and according to the results of the estimated elasticity’s, this trend in the agricultural sector has more acceleration than in the industrial sector. Therefore, surely, the plan of the Iranian governments should be in line with moving in the direction of development by observing the indicators of sustainable development and compatible with nature. In this regard, the results of the present study on the use and exploitation of clean technologies and new production technologies. It emphasizes recycling, renewable energy consumption, green transportation, green chemistry, gray water, etc.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Adom, P.K., Bekoe, W., Amuakwa-Mensah, F., Mensah. J.T. and Botchway, E., 2012. “Carbon dioxide emissions, economic growth, industrial structure, and technical efficiency: empirical evidence from Ghana, Senegal, and Morocco on the causal dynamics”. Energy, 47, 314–325.
  2. Alam, M.M., Murad, M.W., Noman, A.H.M. and Ozturk, I., 2016. “Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and population growth: Testing Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia”. Ecological Indicators, 70, 466-479.
  3. Bekhet, H.A., Matar, A. and Yasmin, T., 2017. “CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and financial development in GCC countries: Dynamic simultaneous equation models”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 117-132
  4. Chen, J., Xu, C. and Song, M., 2020. “Determinants for decoupling economic growth from carbon dioxide emissions in China”. Regional Environmental Change, 20(1), 11.
  5. Fallahi, F. and Shibai, A., 2012. Economic “growth, energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in Iran and OPEC member countries”. Iran's National Environmental Research Conference (In Persian).
  6. Fernández-Amador, O., Francois, J.F., Oberdabernig, D.A. and Tomberger, P., 2017. “Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: An assessment based on production and consumption emission inventories”. Ecological economics, 135, 269-279.
  7. Glasure, Y.U. and Lee, A.R., 1998. “Cointegration, error-correction, and the relationship between GDP and energy: The case of South Korea and Singapore”. Resource and Energy Economics, 20(1), 17-25.
  8. Grossman, G.M. and Krueger, A.B., 1991. “Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement”, (NBER Working Paper No. 3914).
  9. Han, J., Du, T., Zhang, C. and Qian, X., 2018. “Correlation analysis of CO2 emissions, material stocks and economic growth nexus: evidence from Chinese provinces”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 395-406.
  10. Jafari Samimi, A. and Mohammadi-Khiareh, M., 2014. “Short-term and long-term relationship between carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: new evidence in Iran”. Economic research, No.14, 1-20 (In Persian).
  11. Jian, J., Fan, X., He, P., Xiong, H. and Shen, H., 2019. “The Effects of Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and Financial Development on CO2 Emissions in China: A VECM Approach”. Sustainability, 11(18), 4850.
  12. Jardón, A., Kuik, O. and Tol, R.S., 2017. “Economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions: An analysis of Latin America and the Caribbean”. Atmósfera, 30(2), 87-100.
  13. Jayanthakumaran, K., Verma, R. and Liu, Y., 2012. “CO2 emissions, energy consumption, trade and income: a comparative analysis of China and India. Energy Policy, 42, 450-460.
  14. Jafari, Y., Othman, J. and Nor, A.H.S.M., 2012. “Energy consumption, economic growth and environmental pollutants in Indonesia”. Journal of Policy Modeling, 34(6), 879-889.
  15. Kais, S. and Sami, H., 2016. “An econometric study of the impact of economic growth and energy use on carbon emissions: panel data evidence from fifty eight countries”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 1101-1110.
  16. Kraft, J. and Kraft, A., 1978. “On the relationship between energy and GNP”. The Journal of Energy and Development, April, 401–403.
  17. Kuznets Simon, P., 1955. “Economic growth and Income Inequality”. AmEconRev;45: 1–28.
  18. Li, A., Zhang, A., Zhou, Y. and Yao, X., 2017. “Decomposition analysis of factors affecting carbon dioxide emissions across provinces in China”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 1428-1444.
  19. Lotfalipour, M.R., Falahi, M.A. and Ashena, M., 2010. “Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and fossil fuels consumption in Iran”. Energy 35, 5115–5120.
  20. Lotfalipour, M.R., Fallahi, M.A. and Bestam, M., 2011. “Investigating environmental issues and predicting carbon dioxide emissions in Iran's economy”. Iranian Applied Economic Studies, 1(3), 109-81 (In Persian).
  21. Luo, Y., Long, X., Wu, C. and Zhang, J., 2017. “Decoupling CO2 emissions from economic growth in agricultural sector across 30 Chinese provinces from 1997 to 2014”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 159, 220-228.
  22. Luukkanen, J., Panula-Ontto, J., Vehmas, J., Liyong, L., Kaivo-oja, J., Häyhä, L. and Auffermann, B., 2015. “Structural change in Chinese economy: Impacts on energy use and CO2 emissions in the period 2013–2030”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 94, 303-317.
  23. Mardani, A., Streimikiene, D., Cavallaro, F., Loganathan, N. and Khoshnoudi, M., 2019. “Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and economic growth: A systematic review of two decades of research from 1995 to 2017”. Science of the total environment, 649, 31-49.
  24. Nikvaqbal, A.A., Akhtari, F., Amini-Asfidavajani, M. and Attarkashani, M., 2011. “Economic growth, energy consumption growth and carbon dioxide emission growth, investigating the causality relationship with the dynamic integrated data (DPD) approach”, Journal of Energy Economics Studies, 9th, number 33, 169-197 (In Persian).
  25. Panayoyou, T., 2003. “Economic growth and the environment (Economic Survey of Europe, No. 2)”. Retrieved from unece.org.
  26. Pesaran, M.H., 2005. “A Pair-Wise Approach for Testing Output and Growth Convergence”, Journal of Econometrics, no. 138, pp. 312–355.
  27. Phillips, P.C. and Ploberger, W., 1994. “Posterior odds testing for a unit root with data-based model selection”. Econometric Theory, 10(3-4), 774-808.
  28. Rüstemoğlu, H. and Andrés, A.R. “Determinants of CO2 emissions in Brazil and Russia between 1992 and 2011: A decomposition analysis”. Environmental Science and Policy, 58, 95-106.
  29. Shahani, R. and Raghuvansi, K., 2019. “Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Economic Growth: A Bivariate Co-integration Analysis for Two Emerging Markets of India and China”. Vision, 24(1), 9-22.
  30. Shahnazi, R., Hadian, I. and Jergani, L., 2015. “Investigating the causal relationship between the consumption of energy carriers, economic growth and carbon dioxide in Iran's economic sectors”, Economic Growth and Development Research. 28, 51-70 (In Persian).
  31. Suri, A., 2012. “Econometrics with the use of Eviews8 and Stata12”, 2d edition (Vol. 1 and 2), Kulturozhozi publication (In Persian).
  32. Wang, K.M., 2012. “Modelling the nonlinear relationship between CO2 emissions from oil and economic growth”. Economic Modelling, 29(5), 1537-1547.
  33. Wang, Z.X. and Li, Q., 2019. “Modelling the nonlinear relationship between CO2 emissions and economic growth using a PSO algorithm-based grey Verhulst model”. Journal of cleaner production, 207, 214-224.
  34. Wolde-Rufael, Y., 2010. “Bounds test approach to cointegration and causality between nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in India”. Energy Policy, 38(1), 52-58.
  35. Yoo, S.H. and Kwak, S.Y., 2010. “Electricity consumption and economic growth in seven South American countries”. Energy Policy, 38(1), 181-188.
  36. https://www.iea.org/.
  37. http://www.moe.gov.ir