Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Phd Student of Environment Planning, Alborz Campus Faculty, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Environmental Planning, Management and Education, Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Natural capital is essential for human survival and achieving sustainable development goals. Therefore, a scientific framework is required to evaluate regional natural capitals consumption and their capacity to ensure sustainable development. Natural capitals represent the limiting and irreplaceable factors in human well-being and sustainability of every developmental intervention. Degradation of the accumulation and flows of the natural capitals are the fundamental issues in the discussion of environmental sustainability. The current research has been conducted with the aim of investigating the state of ecosystem sustainability by adopting two approaches of ecological footprint and ecosystem services, and in other words, comparing the amount of demand for resources with the supply of goods and services provided by the ecosystem.
Materials and Method: In this research, to investigate the sustainability of Nowshahr's natural and urban ecosystem as the case study, first, the trend of land use changes and its associated phenomena in the region have been investigated using ENVI 5.6 software for processing the satellite images. In order to investigate the change process of the study area, Landsat satellite reference images, TM, ETM+ and OLI sensors were used for the time scale of 2002, 2013 and 2020. Then, the classic ecological footprint of the region was calculated for six types of productive ecosystems, including agricultural lands, pastures, fishing areas, forests, built-up lands, and the carbon demand. The areas of these six land cover types were converted into global hectares using yield and equivalence factors. Subsequently, the maximum amount of ecosystem service flow per global hectare was estimated. And after that, the amount of consumption of natural capital accumulation and the occupation of capital flow in the region were investigated. Finally, the ecosystem stability of the study area was investigated using indicators such as the ecological pressure index (EPI), ecological sustainability index (ESI), ratio of capital stock to flows index, flow occupation ratio index, and excessive natural capital flow index.
Results: According to the research results in the city of Nowshahr, during the period of 2011-2019, the amount of ecological footprint, ecological deficit and pressure have gradually increased, resulting in a reduction of the ecological balance and stability. Only the pasture, forest and fishing areas are in a stable state meaning that the supply of ecological resources is more than the demand, and the pressure is still within the carrying capacity of the ecosystem. In the period of investigation, the amount of use of stock to natural capital flow has increased and has reached almost four times of natural capital flow.
Discussion: Measuring human demand for natural capital and nature's supply is essential for tracking progress, setting goals, and orientating sustainability policies. By combining the two approaches of evaluating ecosystem services and ecological footprint, it is possible to track human demand and nature's supply from a precise subset of ecosystem services, and therefore ecological balance and sustainability can be examined at the local level. Based on the results of the research, the stability of the region and the status of its ecosystem services is threatened by the cultivated land, and mainly the consumption of fossil energy. Based on the results of the research, in the period of investigation, the stability of the city of Nowshahr has decreased and the status of its ecosystem services are threatened by the cultivated land, and mainly the consumption of fossil energy. During this period and considering factors such as land use level, ecological deficit, footprint depth, ecosystem service flow, ecological pressure index, and ecological sustainability index, agricultural land use was the most unsustainable and fishing was the most sustainable use in city of Nowshahr.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Bastianoni, S., Niccolucci, V., Neri, E., Cranston, G., Galli, A. and Wackernagel, M., 2013. Sustainable Development: Ecological Footprint in Accounting. Environ., 2467–2481.
  2. Bi, M.L., Yao, C.Y., Xie, G.D., Liu, J.Y. and Qin, K.Y., 2021. Improvement and application of the three-dimensional ecological footprint model. Ecol. Indic. 125, 107480.
  3. Borucke, M., Moore, D., Cranston, G., Gracey, K., Iha, K., Larson, J., Lazarus, E., Morales, J.C., Wackernagel, M. and Galli, A., 2013. Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: The national footprint accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecol. Indic., 24, 518–533.
  4. Deng, C.X., Liu, Z., Li, R.R. and Li, K., 2018. Sustainability evaluation based on a three-dimensional ecological footprint model: a case study in hunan, China. Sustainability 10, 1–22.
  5. Dong, H.W., Li, P., Feng, Z.M., Yang, Y.Z., You, Z. and Li, Q., 2019. Natural capital utilization on an international tourism island based on a three-dimensional ecological footprint model: a case study of Hainan Province, China. Ecol. Indicat. 104, 479e488.
  6. Ewing, B., Reed, A., Galli, A., Kitzes, J. and Wackernagel, M., 2010. Calculation Methodology for the National Footprint Accounts, 2010 Edition. Ecological Footprint Atlas 2010. Global Footprint Network.
  7. Feng, Z. and Cui, Y., 2018. Assessment of human consumption of ecosystem services in China from 2000 to 2014 based on an ecosystem service footprint model. Ecological Indicators 94.
  8. Franco, S., Pancino, B. and Martella, A., 2021. Mapping National Environmental Sustainability Distribution by Ecological Footprint: The Case of Italy. Sustainability 2021. MDPI.
  9. Igone, P., Miren, O., Pilar, B. and Iosu, M., 2015. Provisioning ecosystem services supply and demand: The role of landscape management to reinforce supply and promote synergies with other ecosystem services. Land use policy. Volume 47, Pages 145-155
  10. Galli, A., Iha, K., Pires, S.M., Mancini, M.S., Alves, A.A., Zokai, G., Lin, D., Murthy, A. and Wackernagel , M., 2020. Assessing the Ecological Footprint and biocapacity of Portuguese cities: Critical results for environmental awareness and local management. 96,
  11. Global Footprint Network, 2022. National Footprint Accounts. Available at: footprintnetwork.org
  12. Kardavani, P., Faraji Rad, A. and Kavoosi, B., 2014. Mazandaran province Geotourism. Journal of Tourism & Hospitality Research Islamic Azad University, Garmsar Branch Vol. 3, No.1, Summer 2014, Pp. 23-47.
  13. Lazarus, E., Lin, D., Martindill, J., Hardiman, J., Pitney, L. and Galli, A., 2015. Biodiversity loss and the ecological footprint of trade. Diversity 7, 170–191.
  14. Li, Y., Wang, Z.C. and Wei, Y.G., 2021. Pathways to progress sustainability: an accurate ecological footprint analysis and prediction for Shandong in China based on integration of STIRPAT model, PLS, and BPNN. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.
  15. Lin, D., Galli, A., Borucke, M. and Lazarus, E., 2016. Tracking supply and demand of biocapacity through ecological footprint accounting. Sustainability Assessment of Renewables.
  16. Liu, T., Wang, H.Z., Wang, H.Z. and Xu, H., 2021. The spatiotemporal evolution of ecological security in China based on the ecological footprint model with localization of parameters. Indic. 126, 107636.
  17. Long, X.Y., Yu, H.J., Sun, M.X., Wang, X.C., Klemes, J.J., Xie, W., Wang, C.D., Li, W.Q. and Wang, Y.T., 2020. Sustainability evaluation based on the Three-dimensional Ecological Footprint and Human Development Index: A case study on the four island regions in China. J. Environ. Manage. 265.
  18. Mancini, M., Galli, A., Coscieme, L., Niccolucci, V. and Lin, D., 2018. Exploring ecosystem services assessment through Ecological Footprint accounting”. Ecosystem Services. Elsevier journal. 30, 228–235.
  19. Niccolucci, V., Bastianoni, S., Tiezzi, E.B.P., Wackernagel, M. and Marchettini, N., 2009. How deep is the footprint? A 3D representation. Ecol. Model. 220 (20), 2819–2823.
  20. Niccolucci, V., Galli, A., Reed, A., Neri, E., Wackernagel, M. and Bastianoni, S., Towards a 3D national ecological footprint geography. Ecological Modelling. 222 (16), 2939–2944.
  21. Syrovátka, M., 2020. Analysis on sustainability interpretations of the Ecological Footprint. Ecol. Econ., 169,
  22. Villamagna, A.M., Angermeier, P.L. and Bennett, E.M., 2013. Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: A conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecol. Complex, 15, 114–121.
  23. Wackernagel , M., Onisto, L. and Bello, P., 1999. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics 29.
  24. Wang, Z.H., Yang, L., Yin, J.H. and Zhang, B., 2018. Assessment and prediction of environmental sustainability in China based on a modified ecological footprint model. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 132, 301–313.
  25. Wu, F.F., Yang, X.H., Shen, Z.Y., Bian, D.H. and Babuna, P., 2021. Exploring sustainability and decoupling effects of natural capital utilization in China: Evidence from a provincial three-dimensional ecological footprint. Journal of Cleaner Production 295 Journal of Cleaner Production 295.
  26. Xun, F. and Hu, Y., 2019. Evaluation of ecological sustainability based on a revised three-dimensional ecological footprint model in Shandong Province, China. Sci. Total Env. 649, 582–591.
  27. Zhang, Z.X., Hu, B.Q., Shi, K.F., Su, K.C. and Yang, Q.Y., 2020. Exploring the dynamic, forecast and decoupling effect of land natural capital utilization in the hinterland of the Three Gorges Reservoir area. China. Sci. Total Environ. 718, 134832.
  28. Zheng, W., Cai, F., Chen, S. and Zhu, J., 2020. Ecological Suitability of Island Development Based on Ecosystem Services Value, Biocapacity and Ecological Footprint: A Case Study of Pingtan Island, Fujian, China”. Sustainability, 12, 2553. www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability.
  29. Zhu, L., Zhang, H., Liao, H. and Peng., 2020. Evaluation of Ecological Sustainability in Chongqing, China Based on 3D Ecological Footprint Model. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics. Vol. 15, No. 1, pp.89-96.
  30. Zhao, S., Zhang, L. and Hong, H. 2009. Linking the concept of ecological footprint and valuation of ecosystem services – a case study of economic growth and natural carrying capacity. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. Vol. 16, No. 2, April 2009, 137–142