Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.

2 Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: Environmental disasters, stakeholder pressure, and global trends have caused the discussion of new energies and businesses in this field to be the focus of researchers. In Iran, the issue of sanctions, dependence of industries on fossil fuels and the traditional mentality of managers has restricted growth and development of clean energy. Development in this field requires a correct understanding of the future and fundamental planning. Without paying attention to financing, which is one of the most important challenges for the development of any business, it will not be possible to continue the activity. Therefore, the current research identified drivers and investment scenarios in the field of clean energy.
Materials and Methods: The current research is pragmatic in terms of philosophy and applied in terms of orientation. Also, this study is exploratory in terms of objective and mixed in terms of methodology. The statistical population of the research were experts in the field of clean energy and financing. Using judgmental sampling, 15 managers working in Iran Renewable Energy Association, Iran Energy Association, Environmental Protection Organization and university professors in the relevant fields have been used. The research has been done in five steps. In the first step, key drivers were identified through background review and interviews with experts. In the second step, the drivers were screened through an expert questionnaire and using the fuzzy Delphi method. In the third step, the screened propellants were analyzed through the effect measurement questionnaire and using the fuzzy Dimetal method, and the final propellants were identified based on the degree of effectiveness. In the fourth step, believable scenarios were developed using CATWOE. The probable scenario was identified with CODAS technique.
Results: By reviewing the background and interviewing experts, 24 drivers were extracted. Using the fuzzy Delphi method, 12 drivers whose diphasis number was higher than the threshold (0.7) were selected. Then, with the Fuzzy Dimetal technique, the two drivers of the laws related to the energy field and the government's view on the need to enter the field of clean energy were identified and evaluated as suitable for the development of scenarios. Based on these two drivers, four scenarios of soul prison, auspicious, Anti-innovation culture, and poisonous structure were developed. The soul prison scenario depicts the pessimistic future and the auspicious scenario shows the best scenario. Then, using CODAS technique, the soul prison scenario was selected as the most probable scenario.
Discussion: Policy makers should try to make Karmiar's ideal scenario happen instead of realizing the soul prison scenario, which happens to be the worst scenario. For this purpose, laws and policies should be established to improve the business environment in the field of clean energy. Such laws should remove obstacles to attract foreign capital while increasing domestic capital. These laws should enable the transfer of advanced technologies through fiscal and financial support. The view of government officials on the need to enter into clean energy as the second most important driver has cultural roots and originates from managers' ignorance of clean energy and its advantages in the business environment. For this reason, universities, research centers, social media, non-governmental organizations supporting the environment, global and regional developments and environmental disasters play an important role in changing this attitude. In Iran, because managers are forced to accept change at the last moment, change is sudden and has increasing costs. It is hard to expect change without doing inclusive and spontaneous cultural work. Cultivation plays an important role in favoring green products. In addition, changing the attitude of managers can lead to the facilitation of financing as a key challenge in the field of clean energy.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Abbasi-Godarzi, A. and Maleki, Abbas., 2017. Renewable Energy policy in I.R.I Journal Strategic Studies of Public policy. 7(3), 159-174. (In Persian with English abstract).
  2. Abu-Rumman, G., Khdair, I.A. and Khadir, I.S., 2020. Current status and future investment potential in renewable energy in Jordan: An overview. Heliyon. 6(2).
  3. Beheshti, M, B., Behboudi, D., Zali, N. and Deljavan, F,A., 2020. Analysis and identification of key factors and drivers affecting integrated water resources management based on futures studies approach (case study of Tabriz County). Iranian Journal of ECO Hydrology. 7(1), 59-76. (In Persian with English abstract).
  4. Bokpin, G.A., 2017. Foreign direct investment and environmental sustainability in Africa: The role of institutions and governance. Research in International Business and Finance. 39, 239-247.
  5. Boldeanu, F. and Constantinescu, L., 2015. The main determinants affecting economic growth. Bull. Transilv. Univ. Brasov. Econ. Sci. Ser. 8, 329.
  6. Bose, S., Dong, G. and Simpson, A., 2019. Financing clean technology innovation and the transition to renewable energy. pp. 339–368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-030-05624-7_14.
  7. Checkland, P. and Poulter, J., 2020. Soft systems methodology. In Systems approaches to making change: A practical guide. Springer, London, 201-253.
  8. Chen, H., Shi, Y. and Zhao, X., 2022. Investment in renewable energy resources, sustainable financial inclusion and energy efficiency: A case of US economy. Resources Policy. 77.
  9. Chen, Y. and Zhao, Z.J., 2021. The rise of green bonds for sustainable finance: Global standards and issues with the expanding Chinese market. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 52, 54-57.
  10. Das, R., Wang, Y., Putrus, G. and Kotter, R., 2020. Economic evaluation of photovoltaic and energy storage technologies for future domestic energy systems–A case study of the UK. Energy. 203, 117-826.
  11. Diesendorf, M. and Elliston, B., 2018. The feasibility of 100% renewable electricity systems: A response to critics. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 93, 318–330.
  12. Erickson, P., Down, A., Lazarus, M. and Koplow, D., 2017. Effect of subsidies to fossil fuel companies on United States crude oil production. Nat. Energy. 2, 891–898.
  13. Geels, F.W., Sovacool, B.K., Schwanen, T. and Sorrell, S., 2017. The socio-technical dynamics of low-carbon transitions. 1, 463–479. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.joule.2017.09.018.
  14. Harjanne, A. and Korhonen, J.M., 2019. Abandoning the concept of renewable energy. Energy Policy. 127, 330–340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.029.
  15. Hayer, S., 2017. Fossil Fuel Subsi dies.
  16. IEA., 2020. Energy Subsidies Tracking the Impact of Fossil-Fuel Subsidies [WWW Document]. Int. Energy Agency, Paris, URL https://www.iea.org/ topics/energy-subsidies. (Accessed 5 June 2020).
  17. Habibi, A., Jahantigh, F.F. and Sarafrazi, A., 2015. Fuzzy Delphi technique for forecasting and screening items. Asian Journal of Research in Business Economics and Management. 5(2), 130-143.
  18. He, D.X., 2016. Coping with climate change and China’s wind energy sustainable development. Adv. Clim. Change Res. 7, 3–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.accre. 2016.06.003.
  19. Heard, B.P., Brook, B.W., Wigley, T.M.L.L. and Bradshaw, C.J.A.A., 2017. Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewableelectricity systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 76, 1122–1133.
  20. IER., 2018. Global Fossil Fuel Consumption Subsidies [WWW Document]. Inst. EnergyRes, URL: https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/fossil-fuels/globalfossil-fuel-consumption-subsidies-abound-not-united-states/. (Accessed 6 June 2020).
  21. IRENA., 2019. Renewable capacity statistics 2019. In: Int. Renew. Energy Agency. IRENA. Abu Dhabi.
  22. Karatop, B., Taskan, B., Adar, E. and Kubat, C., 2021. Decision analysis related to the renewable energy investments in Turkey based on a Fuzzy AHP-EDAS-Fuzzy FMEA approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 151, 106958.
  23. Khan, T., Khanam, S.N., Rahman, M.H. and Rahman, S.M., 2019. Determinants of microfinance facility for installing solar home system (SHS)in rural Bangladesh. Energy Policy. 132, 299–308.
  24. J, C.R. and Majid, M.A., 2020. Renewable energy for sustainable development in India: current status, future prospects, challenges employment, and investment opportunities. Energy, Sustainability and Society.
  25. Laster, R. and Livney, D., 2020. Environmental law in Israel. Kluwer Law International BV.
  26. Lipp, J., 2007. Lessons for effective renewable electricity policy from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy Policy. 35, 5481–5495. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.015.
  27. McCrone, A., Moslener, U., D’Estais, F., Grüning, C. and Emmerich, M., 2020. Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2020 – [WWW Document]. UN Environ. Program. Frankfurt Sch., URL https://www.fs-unep-centre.org/ global-trends- in-renewable-energy- investment-2020/#main. (Accessed 24 July 2020).
  28. Melović, B. and Ćirović, D., 2020. Analysis of financial incentives as an instrument of renewable energy sources management in Montenegro. In: E3S Web Conf. p. 157.
  29. Mirzakhani, H. and Nouri, A., 2014. Identifying the most important factors that increase investment risk in Iran's industrial sector and providing solutions to reduce their negative effects. 13(9, 10), 23-48.
  30. Ohlan, R., 2016. Renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption and economic growth in India. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy. 11(11), 1050-1054.
  31. Polzin, F., Egli, F., Steffen, B. and Schmidt, T., 2019. How do policies mobilize private finance for renewable energy? A systematic review with an investor perspective. Applied Energy. 236, 1249-1268.
  32. Perlaviciute, G. and Steg, L., 2014. Contextual and psychological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives: Integrated review and research agenda. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 35, 361–381. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.003.
  33. Qadir, S.A., Al-Motairi, H., Tahir, F. and Al-Fagih, L., 2021. Incentives and strategies for financing the renewable energy transition: A review. Energy Reports. 7, 3590-3606.
  34. Sackey, D.M., Owusu-Manu, D.G., Asiedu, R.O. and Jehuri, A.B., 2020. Analysis of latent impeding factors to solar photovoltaic investments in Ghana. International Journal of Energy Sector Management.
  35. Sarlaki, E. and Hassan-beygi, S,R., 2019. Production Potentials and Technical Barriers Facing the Development and Utilization of Renewable Energies in Iran. Journal of Renewable and new energy. 6(1), 14-25. (In Persian with English abstract).
  36. Sheikhbahaie, A., Daei-Karimzadeh, S. and Ghobadi, S., 2021. The Interrelationship of Clean Energy, Development of Domestic and Foreign Capital, Economic Growth, and Environmental Quality in a Selection of Developing Countries with the Generalized Method of Moments. Iranian journal energy economy research. 10(40), 11-37. (In Persian with English abstract).
  37. Slaughter, R.A., 2014. Knowledge Base of Futures Studies, the Futures Study Centre.
  38. Taghizadeh-hesary, F. and Yoshino, N., 2020. Sustainable Solutions for Green Financing and Investment in Renewable Energy Project Energies. 13(4).
  39. Taskın, D., Vardar, G. and Okan, B., 2020. Does renewable energy promote green economic growth in OECD countries? Sustainability Accounting. Management and Policy Journal.
  40. Taylor, B.Y.M., 2020. Energy Subsidies: Evolution in the Global Energy Transformation to 2050. International Renewable Energy Agency.
  41. UNESCAP, 2021. Shaping a sustainable energy future in Asia and the Pacific.
  42. United Nations, 2015. COP 21 [WWW Document]. UNFCCC, URL https: //unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/conferences/past-conferences/parisclimate-change-conference-november-2015/cop-21. (Accessed 5 October 2020).
  43. Ye, J., AI-Fadly, A., Quang Huy, P., Quang Ngo, T., Phi Hung, D.D. and Hoang Tien, N., 2022. The nexus among green financial development and renewable energy: investment in the wake of the Covid19 pandemic. Economic research-Ekonomska istrazivanga. 5650-5675.
  44. Yegnegi, K. and Ghasemloo, M.R., 2022. Investment management on renewable energy. Scientific Quarterly of New Business Attitudes. 3(2), 54-71. (In Persian with English abstract).
  45. Zahoor, Z., Khan, I. and Hou, F., 2022. Cleen energy investment and financial development as determinants of environment and sustainable economic growth evidence from china. Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
  46. Zakaria, S.U., Basri, S., Kamarudin, S.K. and Majid, N.A.A.A., 2019. Public awareness analysis on renewable energy in Malaysia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 268,
  47. Zhang, D., Mohsin, M., Khaliq, A., Chang, Y. and Taghizadeh-hesary, F., 2021. Public spending and green economic growth in BRI region: Mediating role of green finance. Energy Policy. 153, 112256.
  48. Zhao, X., Ma, X., Chen, B., Shang, Y. and Song, M., 2022. Challenges toward carbon neutrality in china: strategies and countermeasures. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 176,105959.
  49. Zhao, Z.Y., Chen, Y.L. and Chang, R.D., 2016. How to stimulate renewable energy power generation effectively? - China’s incentive approaches and lessons. Renew. Energy 92, 147–156.
  50. Zhi, Q., Sun, H., Li, Y., Xu, Y. and Su, J., 2014. China’s solar photovoltaic policy: An analysis based on policy instruments. Appl. Energy 129, 308–319.