A Model for Environmental Policies Formulation to Achieve Sustainable Development

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Public Administration, Shoushtar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar, Iran

2 Department of Public Administration, Farabi College Branch, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Public Administration, Masjed Soleyman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Masjed Soleyman, Iran

Abstract
Introduction: The decline in environmental quality has raised public concern about environmental issues. Even in the greenest countries, policymakers face the significant challenge of understanding why environmental policies are often ineffective in addressing these problems. According to the 2024 Global Environmental Performance Index, Iran ranks 133rd out of 180 countries, reflecting a poor global standing and numerous environmental crises, including ecosystem conversion, biodiversity loss, increasing dust storms, drying wetlands and lakes, water resource depletion, land subsidence, and air and soil pollution. Contributing factors include a lack of robust development plans, ineffective environmental policies, outdated laws and regulations, and inadequate coordination among agencies and organizations. These issues underscore the urgent need for effective environmental policymaking to address the growing crises. This study, recognizing the importance of the formulation stage in public policymaking, proposes a model for developing environmental policies in Iran to address these challenges and reduce environmental pollution.
Materials and Methods: This study employed a qualitative research approach, incorporating both library and field research methods for data collection. Data were gathered through note-taking and expert interviews. The analysis was conducted using a thematic analysis strategy, chosen for its ability to extract meaningful insights from qualitative data, such as interview transcripts. The coding and thematic analysis process followed a comprehensive, step-by-step approach. Using purposive sampling, the research team interviewed 13 experts, including university professors, environmental researchers, executives from the Environmental Protection Organization, and managers involved in environmental policymaking. The interviews continued until thematic saturation was achieved, indicating no new themes or concepts were emerging. To ensure reliability, the test-retest reliability index was applied to the coding of the interviews. In this approach, a few randomly selected interviews were coded and then re-coded after a certain period to compare the consistency of the codes. This technique helped verify the reliability of the thematic analysis process.
Results: The study results indicate that a model for formulating environmental policies to achieve sustainable development comprises eight key themes: economic factors, social factors, environmental factors, political factors, legal requirements, institutional capacity, key stakeholders in policy formulation, and the process of formulating environmental policies. Each theme plays a crucial role in policy development. Addressing environmental issues without a collective approach to these themes is likely to be ineffective. A fragmented approach to implementing these themes can lead to disruptions in development and significant harm to environmental resources. The results emphasize the need for a comprehensive approach that considers all these factors to effectively address environmental challenges and work toward sustainable developmen.
Discussion: To effectively tackle environmental crises, a holistic approach must be embraced in environmental policy formulation. Social, political, legal, and institutional factors must be carefully considered to avoid severe challenges and complications. Active participation from community organizations, NGOs, citizens, and local stakeholders in policymaking can play a significant role in resolving environmental issues. This requires not only the restructuring of institutional frameworks to strengthen environmental governance but also a review of existing legal systems to ensure they are conducive to effective policymaking. It also highlights the importance of combining bottom-up and top-down policies to improve environmental performance indicators. Bottom-up opportunities from local communities and civil society, along with top-down engagement from legislative, executive, and judicial branches, are critical to shaping effective policies.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. Amini, A., Abedi, M., Nesari, E., Daryadel, E., Kolahi, M., Mianabadi, H. and Fisher, J., 2023. The Paris Agreement's Approach Toward Climate Change Loss and Damage. World Affairs, 186(1), pp.46-80.
  2. Birkland, T.A., 2019. An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. Routledge.
  3. Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2023. Is thematic analysis used well in health psychology? A critical review of published research, with recommendations for quality practice and reporting. Health Psychology Review, 17(4), pp.695-718.
  4. Dixon, R. and Landau, D.E., 2021. Abusive Constitutional Borrowing: legal globalization and the subversion of liberal democracy. Oxford University Press.
  5. EPI, 2024. Environmental Performance Index 2024. Yale University.
  6. Gholamhosein Ghoochani, S., Hatami Yazd, A. and Kolahi, M., 2023. Wetlands Conservation Through CEPA Program, a Case Study of Hashilan Wetland in Kermanshah. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 11(3), pp.159-174. (In Persian with English Abstract).
  7. Howlett, M., 2019. Designing public policies: Principles and instruments. Routledge.
  8. Jahanishakib, F., Erfani, M. and Yusefi Rubiat, E., 2020. Explanation of Effective Drivers in Environmental Management of South Khorasan Province Using Structural Analysis. The Journal of Spatial Planning, 24(1), pp.109-127. (In Persian with English Abstract).
  9. Kahrobaei, A., Kolahi, M. and Anabestani, A., 2022. Impact of Socio-economic factors on the Success of Rangeland Management Plans at Baharkish Watershed of Quchan County. Journal of Geographical Studies of Mountainous Areas, 3(11), pp.189-206. (In Persian with English Abstract).
  10. Kermani, B.M.M., Mirzaei, H., Kolahi, M. and Kermani, M., 2023. Sociological Explanation of Factors Affecting Households Energy Consumption in Iran. Journal of Electrical Electronics Engineering, 2(3), 249-258. https://dx.doi.org/10.33140/JEEE
  11. Khashtabeh, R., Akbari, M., Kolahi, M. and Talebanfard, A., 2021. Assessing the effects of desertification control projects using socio-economic indicators in the arid regions of eastern Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(7), pp.10455-10469.
  12. Kiger, M.E. and Varpio, L., 2020. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical teacher, 42(8), pp.846-854.
  13. King, N., 2012. Doing template analysis. Qualitative organizational research: Core methods and current challenges, 26, p.426.
  14. Kolahi, M. and AzimiSeginSara, R., 2023. Socio-environmental responsibility in Iranian universities: A multidimensional perspective. Environmental Conservation, 50(4), pp.267-274.
  15. Kolahi, M., 2020. Administrative organizational structures towards general environmental policies. Quarterly Journal of the Macro and Strategic Policies, 8(31), pp.510-534. (In Persian with English Abstract).
  16. Kolahi, M., 2021. Natural resources stakeholders. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 8(1), pp. 19-30. (In Persian with English Abstract).
  17. Kolahi, M., Davary, K. and Omranian Khorasani, H., 2024. Integrated approach to water resource management in Mashhad Plain, Iran: actor analysis, cognitive mapping, and roadmap development. Scientific Reports, 14(1), p.162.
  18. Kolahi, M., Jannatichenar, M., Davies, K. and Hoffmann, C., 2023. Legal conflicts among natural resources stakeholders in Iran. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 50(1), 160-179.
  19. Kolahi, M., Omranian Khorasani, H. and Sharifi, Z., 2023. Socio-Economic Analysis of the Renovation and Improvement Plan of Urban Texture Surrounding Razavi Holy Shrine. Physical Social Planning, 10(2), pp.17-32. (In Persian with English Abstract).
  20. Lownsdale, W.S., 2001. The development and validity of the psychological symptoms scan. Northern Illinois University.
  21. LRPIRI, 2024. Laws and Regulations Portal of Islamic Republic of Iran. Available at: https://qavanin.ir/ (Accessed 23 May 2024).
  22. Mamivand, B., Aminisabeq, Z., Sadeh, E. and Khalaj, M., 2018. Designing a Model for Environmental Policies in Iran. Social Science Quarterly, 12(40), pp.31-58. (In Persian with English Abstract).
  23. Matoufi, A. and Dankoub, M., 2017. Prioritizing the effective factors on environmental policy formulation in Iran using ANP method. Parliament and Strategy Journal, 24, pp. 125-156 (In Persian with English Abstract).
  24. Mianabadi, A., Davary, K., Kolahi, M. and Fisher, J., 2022. Water/climate nexus environmental rural-urban migration and coping strategies. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 65(5), pp.852-876.
  25. Mianabadi, A., Davary, K., Mianabadi, H., Kolahi, M. and Mostert, E., 2023. Toward the development of a conceptual framework for the complex interaction between environmental changes and rural-urban migration. Frontiers in Water, 5, 1142307.
  26. Mohammadabadi, F. and Kolahi, M., 2022. Factors affecting people's engagement in the implemented natural resources plans at Khorasan Razavi Province. Journal of Range and Watershed Managment, 74(4), pp.821-835. (In Persian with English Abstract).
  27. Nowell, L.S., Norris, J.M., White, D.E. and Moules, N.J., 2017. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International journal of qualitative methods, 16(1), p.1609406917733847.
  28. Paieste, M., Kolahi, M. and Omranian Khorasani, H., 2022. Promoting natural resource management with an emphasis on good governance. Rangeland, 16(1), pp.140-157. (In Persian with English Abstract).
  29. Pirali Zefrehei, A.R., Kolahi, M. and Fisher, J., 2022. Ecological-environmental challenges and restoration of aquatic ecosystems of the Middle-Eastern. Scientific Reports, 12(1), p.17229.
  30. PourAsghar Sangachin, F., 2019. Environmental Policy Making. Environmental Encyclopedia, 1(1), pp.1-4. (In Persian with English Abstract).
  31. Pourbafrani, H. and Hemati, M., 2016. A Critique on Iranian Criminal Policy towards Environmental Crimes. Parliament and Strategy Journal, 23, pp. 349-373. (In Persian with English Abstract).
  32. Ramezani Ghavam Abadi, M. and Shafighfard, H., 2016. Sustainable Development and Right to a Healthy Environment: Contradiction or Companionship, World PoliticsA QuarterlyJournal,5(1),pp.241-271. (In Persian with English Abstract).
  33. Ravanbakhsh, M., 2013. Iran situation in environmental sustainable development. Environment and Development Journal, 4(7), pp.73-82. (In Persian with English Abstract).
  34. Rezvanifar, M., 2014. An introduction to environmental policy in Iran's legal system. Majd Publication, Tehran. (In Persian)
  35. Soleymani, A., Farani, A.Y., Karimi, S., Azadi, H., Nadiri, H. and Scheffran, J., 2021. Identifying sustainable rural entrepreneurship indicators in the Iranian context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, p.125186.
  36. Sotoudeh Foumani, B., Kolahi, M., Mohammadi Limaei, S., Fisher, J. and Rostami Shahraji, T., 2021. Multiple streams framework and logging policy change in the Hyrcanian forests of Iran. Australian Forestry, 84(4), pp.191-199.
  37. Tamassoki, E. and Kolahi, M., 2023. Conceptual model for ethical roots of environmental crisis. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 9(4), pp.77-88. (In Persian with English Abstract).
  38. Tamassoki, E., Mohammadi Kangarani, H., Ashtariyan, K., Holisaz, A. and Naderi, F., 2021. Problemology of Iran's Environmental Policy-making. Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 7(2), pp.109-125. (In Persian with English Abstract).
  39. Trowbridge, J., 2022. A Six-Case Comparative Study to Identify Systems Thinking in Government-Designed Public Health Strategies (Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)).