Presenting the Model of Eco-Leadership in Elementary Schools with an Interpretive Phenomenological Approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational scinence and psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

2 Department of Educational Administration, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
Introduction: Nowadays, environmental protection and conservation have become a critical issue worldwide. This has led to significant managerial and leadership challenges in the current state of the educational fabric of schools. Many principals and teachers argue that talking about ecological educational and training activities and observing the environmental conditions of schools is still the missing link in the educational system, which is impossible without valid reflections and criticisms of the school environment. Thus, schools need environmental leadership to address these challenges, which has attracted the special attention of leadership researchers. This research aims to present an ecological leadership model in elementary schools with an interpretive phenomenological approach.
Materials and Methods: The research method is qualitative regarding its objectives and interpretive phenomenology in data collection. The research environment consists of school principals and teachers who have a history of green schools. They were selected using a targeted snowball sampling method to reach 23 participants until theoretical saturation was achieved. The data collection tool was a semi-structured interview developed based on the understanding and experiences of teachers and school principals in different regions of Ardabil province. The interview protocol was evaluated for validity and reliability using Cohen's Kappa coefficient, which yielded a value of 0.71, indicating a relatively high level of agreement between coders.
Results: The study uncovered that environmental leadership is delineated by 98 concepts across 17 axes, organized into three main themes. Drawing from insights of managers and teachers, it embodies six core attributes: fostering group cohesion, envisioning ideals, acting on beliefs, showing individual consideration, and providing inspirational motivation. These characteristics of environmental leadership are nurtured through value philosophy, goals and objectives, overarching policies, educational and training frameworks, psychological underpinnings, and sociological contexts. Nonetheless, advancing environmental leadership encounters significant challenges, necessitating a nuanced grasp of supportive environments from academic and training policymakers.     
Discussion: Given the urgent need for environmental leadership in elementary schools, achieving sustainable environmental practices in the future depends on training school administrators and engaging both internal and external stakeholders. This research addresses the challenges and issues fronted by these agendas, aligning with recent Ministry of Education initiatives (since 2018) aimed at implementing environmental programs in schools. The findings of this research have innovatively defined environmental leadership within educational management, identified and analyzed environmental challenges specific to elementary schools, and proposed solutions. These insights pave the way for a new leadership model capable of navigating school ecological complexities and addressing local community environmental concerns in future crises.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. Abdimannabovna, M.L., 2021. Formation of the Ecological Culture of Schoolchildren in the Study of Natural Science. International Journal of Innovative Analyses and Emerging Technology, 1(6), 73-76.
  2. Attride-Stirling, J., 2001. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, 1(3), pp.385-405.
  3. Bronfenbrenner, U., 1977. Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513
  4. Bronfenbrenner, U., 1992. Ecological systems theory. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  5. Bryson, M., and De Castell, S., 1998. New technologies and the cultural ecology of primary schooling: Imagining teachers as Luddites in/deed. Educational Policy, 12(5), 542-567.
  6. Creswell, J.W. and Poth, C.N., 2016.Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
  7. Hertler, S.C., Figueredo, A.J., Peñaherrera-Aguirre, M. and Fernandes, H.B., 2018. Urie Bronfenbrenner: Toward an evolutionary ecological systems theory. In Life history evolution (pp. 323-339). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
  8. Ho, J., Foo Seong Ng, D., Chua, P.H. and Binte Munir, N., 2021. Leadership across schools to diffuse an education innovation: applying complexity leadership theory with ecological leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, pp.1-23.
  9. Ho, J., Hung, D., Chua, P.H. and Binte Munir, N., 2022. Integrating Distributed with Ecological Leadership: Through the Lens of Activity Theory. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, p.17411432221077156.
  10. Kang, H.S. and Lee, Y.B., 2014. Towards a cultural ecology of pedagogy based on Bruner’s narrative theory. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 71, 115-118.
  11. Ke Hanlin, etc., 2012. Cultural Ecology and the evolution of Theoretical Criticism of Chinese literature in the 20th Century. Beijing: China Social Science Press
  12. Kutsyuruba, B. and Walker, K., 2015. The lifecycle of trust in educational leadership: An ecological perspective. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 18(1), pp.106-121.
  13. Mohammadi Bolbanabad, A., Seifi, M. and Nateghi, F., 2022. Developing Environmental Education Criteria and Indicators in Iranian Elementary Education System in 1404. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 10(2), 99-115. doi: 10.30473/ee.2022.50804.2159 (In Persian with English abstract).
  14. Navarro, J.L. and Tudge, J.R., 2022. Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological Theory. Current Psychology, 1-17.
  15. Niazi, M., Noruzi, M., Sharifi, E. and Khoramian, R., 2018. Inefficiency Analysis of Prevention Programs: Qualitative Research . etiadpajohi; 12 (47) :73-92. (In Persian with English abstract).
  16. Rau, G. and Shih, Y.S., 2021. Evaluation of Cohen's kappa and other measures of inter-rater agreement for genre analysis and other nominal data. Journal of english for academic purposes, 53, p.101026.
  17. Rummler, K., 2014. Foundations of socio-cultural ecology: Consequences for media education and mobile learning in schools. MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung, 24, 1-17.
  18. Sharifi, N., Shahtalebi, B. and Etebarian, A., 2020. 'School of Future in Iran: Grounded Theory Method', Sociological Cultural Studies, 11(2), pp. 87-115. doi: 10.30465/scs.2020.5538 (In Persian with English abstract).
  19. Tan, C.Y., 2022. Influence of Cultural Values on Singapore School Leadership. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 17411432211073414.
  20. Toh, Y., Jamaludin, A., Hung, W.L.D. and Chua, P.M.H., 2014. Ecological leadership: Going beyond system leadership for diffusing school-based innovations in the crucible of change for 21st century learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23, pp.835-850.
  21. Western, S., 2010. Eco-leadership: Towards the development of a new paradigm. In Leadership for environmental sustainability (pp. 50-68). Routledge.
  22. Western, S., 2019. Leadership: A critical text. Leadership, pp.1-456.
  23. Wielkiewicz, R.M. and Stelzner, S.P., 2005. An ecological perspective on leadership theory, research, and practice. Review of General Psychology, 9(4), pp.326-341.
  24. Xue, X., 2019. School Education and Cultural Inheritance of Yi Nationality: Educational Choices Based on Cultural Ecology in Yi Areas of Liangshan. DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science, (esem).
  25. Zala-Mezö, E., Bormann, I., Strauss, N.C. and Müller-Kuhn, D., 2020. Distributed leadership practice in Swiss “eco-schools” and its influence on school improvement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 19(4), pp.673-695.
  26. Zhang, Y., 2021. Brief Analysis on Imbalance of Cultural Ecology in Our Foreign Language Teaching. In 2021 2nd Asia-Pacific Conference on Image Processing, Electronics and Computers (pp. 377-380).