Investigating the Relationship between Renewable Energy Consumption and Environmental Degradation

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

10.22034/envj.2025.485997.1427
Abstract
Introduction: In recent decades, human activities have significantly damaged the environment, and currently, the emission of greenhouse gases and global warming are among the most important environmental issues. The use of fossil energy has made a major contribution to the emission of greenhouse gases and as a result the destruction of the environment by humans. Due to the role of renewable energies in reducing the emission of pollutants and as a result reducing the destruction of the environment, more use of these energies has attracted the attention of countries. Therefore, in this study, the relationship between renewable energy consumption and environmental degradation (ecological footprint index) in 38 countries with lower average income during the period of 1997 to 2020 has been investigated.
Materials and Methods: For this purpose, the system of simultaneous equations and the three-stage least squares method (3SLS) were used. In order to estimate the system of simultaneous equations, first, the stationary of the variables was checked, and to avoid spurious regression, the co-integration of the equations was checked using the Kao test. Then, using the Hausman test, a choice was made between the two methods of estimating the panel data. After that, the simultaneity bias test was performed to check the existence of simultaneity between the endogenous variables and finally, in order to analyze the data, the system of equations was estimated using the 3SLS method. The necessary statistics and information were collected from the Global Footprint Network website and the World Bank database for the period of 1997-2020.
Results: The empirical results showed that there is a negative relationship between environmental degradation and renewable energy consumption, and with a one-unit increase in renewable energy consumption, the ecological footprint decreases by 0.0071. With a one-unit increase in the variables of foreign direct investment, urbanization, technological innovation, and economic growth, the amount of renewable energy consumption decreases by 0.78, 0.32, 0.06, and 33.9 units, respectively. The amount of renewable energy consumption increases by 0.34 units with a one-unit increase in the variable of natural resource rent. A one-unit increase in the variables of crop production, livestock production index, and financial development index will increase the ecological footprint by 0.0022, 0.0042, and 0.0107 units. With a one-unit increase in foreign direct investment, the ecological footprint decreases by 0.023 units.
Discussion: The results showed that increasing the use of renewable energy can improve the quality of the environment. The financial sector has allocated resources to enterprises that have led to an increase in industrial waste, pollution emissions, and consequently environmental degradation. The agricultural sector has caused pollution and environmental degradation through livestock farming, ammonia in fertilizers on agricultural fields, livestock wastewater wetlands, slaughtering meat animals, corn and soy protein production, sugar refining, wool processing, and other things. Foreign capital can reduce environmental degradation by facilitating the development of modern environmentally friendly technologies. Increasing the efficiency of natural resources motivates people to use them effectively and efficiently and increases the consumption of renewable energies. Therefore, directing foreign direct investments and technological innovations towards greater use of renewable energies, increasing the natural resource rent, directing national resources towards environmentally friendly activities and technologies, increasing the productivity of crop and livestock production, and using environmentally friendly technologies in the agricultural sector can help reduce environmental degradation.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. Abdo, A.B., Bin, L., Zhang, X., Saeed, M., Qahtan, A.S.A. and Ghallab, H.M.H., 2022. Spatial analysis of financial development's effect on the ecological footprint of belt and road initiative countries: Mitigation options through renewable energy consumption and institutional quality. Journal of Cleaner Production. 366, 132696.
  2. Adekoya, O.B., Oliyide, J.A. and Fasanya, I.O., 2022. Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption–Ecological footprint nexus in net-oil exporting and net-oil importing countries: Policy implications for a sustainable environment. Renewable Energy. 189, 524-534.
  3. Akar, B.G., 2016. The determinants of renewable energy consumption: An empirical analysis for the Balkans. European Scientific Journal. 12(11), 594.
  4. Alam, M.M. and Murad, M.W., 2020. The impacts of economic growth, trade openness and technological progress on renewable energy use in organization for economic co-operation and development countries. Renewable Energy. 145, 382-390.
  5. Amer, E.A.A.A., Meyad, E.M.A., Gao, Y., Niu, X., Chen, N., Xu, H. and Zhang, D., 2022. Exploring the link between natural resources, urbanization, human capital, and ecological footprint: A case of GCC countries. Ecological Indicators. 144, 109556.
  6. Ansari, M.A., Haider, S. and Masood, T., 2021. Do renewable energy and globalization enhance ecological footprint: an analysis of top renewable energy countries? Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28(6), 6719-6732.
  7. Ardali, F., 2014. Comparison of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on the ecological footprint index in Iran, The first international conference on international business, economic studies and humanities, Shiraz, Iran. (In Persian)
  8. Atif, S.M. and Siddiqi, M.W., 2010. The electricity consumption and economic growth nexus in Pakistan: A new evidence. Available at SSRN 1569580.
  9. Baloch, M.A., Zhang, J., Iqbal, K. and Iqbal, Z., 2019. The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 26(6), 6199-6208.
  10. Baz, K., Xu, D., Ali, H., Ali, I., Khan, I., Khan, M.M. and Cheng, J., 2020. Asymmetric impact of energy consumption and economic growth on ecological footprint: using asymmetric and nonlinear approach. Science of the Total Environment. 718, 137364.
  11. Bhattacharya, M., Paramati, S.R., Ozturk, I. and Bhattacharya, S., 2016. The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: Evidence from top 38 countries. Applied energy. 162, 733-741.
  12. Cetin, M.A., 2018. Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve and the role of green energy: emerging and developed markets. International Journal of Green Energy. 15(1), 37-44.
  13. Chang, T., Gupta, R., Inglesi-Lotz, R., Simo-Kengne, B., Smithers, D. and Trembling, A., 2015. Renewable energy and growth: Evidence from heterogeneous panel of G7 countries using Granger causality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 52, 1405-1412.
  14. Charfeddine, L. and Mrabet, Z., 2017. The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: A panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 76, 138-154.
  15. Chen, H., Rehman, M.A., Luo, J. and Ali, M., 2022. Dynamic influence of natural resources, financial integration and eco-innovation on ecological sustainability in EKC framework: Fresh insights from China. Resources Policy. 79, 103043.
  16. Destek, M.A. and Aslan, A., 2017. Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth in emerging economies: Evidence from bootstrap panel causality. Renewable Energy. 111, 757-763.
  17. Dietz, T. and Rosa, E.A., 1994. Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence 597 and technology. Human Ecology Review. 1(2), 277-300.
  18. Dietz, T. and Rosa, E.A., 1997. Environmental impacts of population and consumption. Environmentally significant consumption: Research directions, 92-99.
  19. Ehtemami, N., 2021. The effect of foreign direct investment and consumption of renewable energy on reducing environmental degradation in selected developing countries. 1st International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Management, Economy and Accounting, Brussels, Belgium. (In Persian)
  20. Eren, B.M., Taspinar, N. and Gokmenoglu, K.K., 2019. The impact of financial development and economic growth on renewable energy consumption: Empirical analysis of India. Science of the Total Environment. 663, 189-197.
  21. Ergun, S.J., Owusu, P.A. and Rivas, M.F., 2019. Determinants of renewable energy consumption in Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 26(15), 15390-15405.
  22. Huang, Y., Ahmad, M. and Ali, S., 2022. The impact of trade, environmental degradation and governance on renewable energy consumption: Evidence from selected ASEAN countries. Renewable Energy. 197, 1144-1150.
  23. Hye, Q.M.A. and Riaz, S., 2008. Causality between energy consumption and economic growth: the case of Pakistan. The Lahore Journal of Economics. 13(2), 45-58.
  24. Islam, M.M., Irfan, M., Shahbaz, M. and Vo, X.V., 2022. Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in Bangladesh: The relative influencing profiles of economic factors, urbanization, physical infrastructure and institutional quality. Renewable Energy. 184, 1130-1149.
  25. Kahia, M., Aïssa, M.S.B. and Lanouar, C., 2017. Renewable and non-renewable energy use-economic growth nexus: The case of MENA Net Oil Importing Countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 71, 127-140.
  26. Kang, X., Khan, F.U., Ullah, R., Arif, M., Rehman, S.U. and Ullah, F., 2021. Does foreign direct investment influence renewable energy consumption? empirical evidence from south Asian countries. Energies. 14(12), 3470.
  27. Kargar Dehbidi, N. and Esmaeili, A., 2018. Assessing the Effects of Economic Factors on Environmental Pollution in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics Researches. 9(4), 85-108. (In Persian)
  28. Khan, A., Chenggang, Y., Hussain, J. and Kui, Z., 2021. Impact of technological innovation, financial development and foreign direct investment on renewable energy, non-renewable energy and the environment in belt & Road Initiative countries. Renewable Energy. 171, 479-491.
  29. Khanmohamadi, E. and Mahravan, A., 2019. Assessing the Mitigation of Environmental Impacts of Using Renewable Resources in Rural Areas (Case Study: Nejobaran Village-Kermanshah-Iran). Housing and Rural Environment. 38(165), 97-112.
  30. Kilicarslan, Z., 2019. The relationship between foreign direct investment and renewable energy production: Evidence from Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa and Turkey. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 9(4), 291-297.
  31. Kitzes, J., Peller, A., Goldfinger, S. and Wackernagel, M., 2007. Current methods for calculating national ecological footprint accounts. Science for Environment & Sustainable society. 4, 1-9.
  32. Kuriqi, A., Pinheiro, A.N., Sordo-Ward, A. and Garrote, L., 2020. Water-energy-ecosystem nexus: Balancing competing interests at a run-of-river hydropower plant coupling a hydrologic–ecohydraulic approach. Energy Conversion and Management. 223, 113267.
  33. Li, Z., Leong, L.W., Aldoseri, M.M.N., Muda, I., Abu-Rumman, A. and Al Shraah, A., 2023. Examining the role of sustainability and natural resources management in improving environmental quality: Evidence from Asian countries. Resources Policy. 80, 103136.
  34. Liddle, B., 2004. Demographic dynamics and per capita environmental impact: Using panel regressions and household decompositions to examine population and transport. Population and Environment.  26(1), 23-39.
  35. Liu, J., Murshed, M., Chen, F., Shahbaz, M., Kirikkaleli, D. and Khan, Z., 2021. An empirical analysis of the household consumption-induced carbon emissions in China. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 26, 943-957.
  36. Liu, X., 2022. Impact of urbanization on energy consumption and haze in China-A review. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 44(1), 1959-1976.
  37. Lotfalipor, M.R., Falahi, M.A. and Bastam, M., 2012. The Environmental Issues and Forecasting of Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Iran Economy. Journal of Applied Economics Studies in Iran. 1(3), 81-109. (In Persian)
  38. Matei, I., 2017. Is there a Link between renewable energy consumption and economic growth? a dynamic panel investigation for the OECD Countries. Revue d'economie politique. 127(6), 985-1012.
  39. Monfreda, C., Wackernagel, M. and Deumling, D., 2004. Establishing National Natural Capital Accounts Based on Detailed Ecological Footprint and Biological Capacity Assessments. Land Use Policy. 21, 231-246.
  40. Mrabet, Z. and Alsamara, M., 2017. Testing the Kuznets Curve hypothesis for Qatar: A comparison between carbon dioxide and ecological footprint. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 70, 1366-1375.
  41. Muhammad, B., Khan, M.K., Khan, M.I. and Khan, S., 2021. Impact of foreign direct investment, natural resources, renewable energy consumption, and economic growth on environmental degradation: evidence from BRICS, developing, developed and global countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(17), 21789-21798.
  42. Mukhtarov, S., Mikayilov, J.I., Humbatova, S. and Muradov, V., 2020. Do high oil prices obstruct the transition to renewable energy consumption? Sustainability. 12(11), 4689.
  43. Naghdi, Y., Kaghazian, S. and Lashkarizadeh, M., 2022. The Impact of Urbanization on the consumption renewable and non-renewable energies in selected Developing countries, Journal of Environmental Sciences and Technology. 23(11), 25-36. (In Persian)
  44. Nasreen, S., Anwar, S. and Ozturk, I., 2017. Financial stability, energy consumption and environmental quality: Evidence from South Asian economies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 67, 1105-1122.
  45. Nathaniel, S. and Khan, S.A.R., 2020. The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy, trade, and ecological footprint in ASEAN countries. Journal of Cleaner Production. 272, 122709.
  46. Nijkamp, P., Rossi, E. and Vindigni, G., 2004. Ecological footprints in plural: a metaanalytic comparison of empirical results. Regional Studies. 38(7), 747-765.
  47. Omri, A., Nguyen, D.K. and Rault, C., 2014. Causal interactions between CO2 emissions, FDI, and economic growth: Evidence from dynamic simultaneous-equation models. Economic Modelling. 42, 382-389.
  48. Panwar, N.L., Kaushik, S.C. and Kothari, S., 2011. Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 15(3), 1513-1524.
  49. Pata, U.K., 2021. Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity, CO2 emissions, and ecological footprint in the USA: testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28(1), 846-861.
  50. Rafindadi, A.A. and Ozturk, I., 2017. Impacts of renewable energy consumption on the German economic growth: Evidence from combined cointegration test. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 75, 1130-1141.
  51. Rehman, A., Ma, H., Ahmad, M., Irfan, M., Traore, O. and Chandio, A.A., 2021. Towards environmental Sustainability: Devolving the influence of carbon dioxide emission to population growth, climate change, Forestry, livestock and crops production in Pakistan. Ecological Indicators. 125, 107460.
  52. Sadeghi, K., Sajoudi, S. and Ahmadzadeh, F., 2017. Renewable Energy, Economic Growth and Quality of the Environment in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Energy Policy and Planning Research. 3(1), 171-202. (In Persian)
  53. Salim, R.A. and Rafiq, S., 2012. Why do some emerging economies proactively accelerate the adoption of renewable energy? Energy economics. 34(4), 1051-1057.
  54. Sarkodie, S. and Owusu, P., 2017. The relationship between carbon dioxide, crop and food production index in Ghana: By estimating the long-run elasticities and variance decomposition. Environmental Engineering Research. 22(2), 193-202.
  55. Sharif, A., Baris-Tuzemen, O., Uzuner, G., Ozturk, I. and Sinha, A., 2020. Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: Evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Sustainable Cities and Society. 57, 102138.
  56. Sharma, R., Sinha, A. and Kautish, P., 2021. Does renewable energy consumption reduce ecological footprint? Evidence from eight developing countries of Asia. Journal of Cleaner Production. 285, 124867.
  57. Skin Salvarli, M. and Salvarli, H., 2020. For sustainable development: future trends in renewable energy and enabling technologies. In Renewable Energy-Resources, Challenges and Applications. IntechOpen.
  58. Tang, D.L., Li, L. and Hong, X.F., 2017. The spatial spillover effect of energy consumption on haze pollution in China-An empirical research based on the static and dynamic spatial panel data model. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice. 37(7), 1697-1708.
  59. Tarazkar, M.H., Kargar Dehbidi, N. and Shokoohi, Z., 2018. Estimating the ecological footprint of agricultural production in D-8 Islamic countries. Environmental Sciences. 16(4), 17-32. (In Persian)
  60. Tohidi, A., Shahnoushi Foroushani, N., Mohammadi, H. and Alizadeh, P., 2015. An Empirical Evaluation of the Effects of Trade and Financial-Openness on Government Size: An Application of Simultaneous Equation System in Panel Data. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics. 11(4), 1-19. (In Persian)
  61. Ullah, A., Ahmed, M., Raza, S.A. and Ali, S., 2021. A threshold approach to sustainable development: Nonlinear relationship between renewable energy consumption, natural resource rent, and ecological footprint. Journal of Environmental Management. 295, 113073.
  62. Usman, O., Akadiri, S.S. and Adeshola, I., 2020. Role of renewable energy and globalization on ecological footprint in the USA: implications for environmental sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 27(24), 30681-30693.
  63. Wiedmann, T., Minx, J., Barrett, J. and Wackernagel, M., 2006. Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input–output analysis. Ecological Economics. 56(1), 28-48.
  64. Yasmeen, R., Zhaohui, C., Shah, W.U.H., Kamal, M.A. and Khan, A., 2022. Exploring the role of biomass energy consumption, ecological footprint through FDI and technological innovation in B&R economies: A simultaneous equation approach. Energy. 244, 122703.
  65. Zabihi, S.M.G., Akbari, F. and Salehnia, N., 2023. The Effect of Renewable Energy Consumption on Reducing Carbon Emissions (With Emphasis on Wind and Solar Energy). Journal of Energy Economics Modeling. 1(1), 1-28. (In Persian)
  66. Zafar, M.W., Zaidi, S.A.H., Khan, N.R., Mirza, F.M., Hou, F. and Kirmani, S.A.A., 2019. The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: the case of the United States. Resources Policy. 63, 101428.
  67. Zappa, W., Junginger, M. and Van Den Broek, M., 2019. Is a 100% renewable European power system feasible by 2050. Applied Energy. 233, 1027-1050.