Environmental Risks Assessment and Management of Process Units in Paper Industry Using, E-FMEA Approach (Case Study: Persia Golestan Paper Factory)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

10.22034/envj.2025.519134.1495
Abstract
Introduction: Industrial development is the result of changes in methods and development of new machines that have been created in order to provide the needs of human societies, failure to impact assessment of these issues can leads to serious risks for humans and environment. Therefore, it is necessary and essential to achieve management and purposeful tool that accurately identifies and effectively controls potential and actual threats to health, safety, and the environment. Among various industries, the pulp and paper industry are a growing industry due to the high per capita production of paper to provide the needs of society and has been identified as the sixth most polluting industry in the world. In addition to environmental impacts, this industry may pose many risks to the workforce that are working in it, which has led to greater attention to the issue of health-safety and especially environmental risk assessment. Therefore, it is necessary to identify the risks that threaten human resources and the environment and to propose solutions to reduce these risks to this industry.
Material and Methods: In this study, the EFMEA (Environmental Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) method, which is an efficient method of the environmental risk assessment, was used to identify and assess the environmental risks of the Golestan Persia Paper Company. Initially, the risks of process units (including the pulping unit, production line, and steam boiler unit) were identified. In the next step, the impacts of the identified risks were evaluated using the components of consequence severity, probability of occurrence, and probability of detection and identification. After determining the confidence limit, environmental risks were classified and finally control/corrective measures were proposed to eliminate or reduce the risks. In the final step, a secondary assessment of environmental risks was conducted after corrective actions, and the priority of implementing the corrective measures was determined according to the degree of feasibility.
Results: Of the 16 environmental risks identified, 3 were at high risk level, 11 at medium risk level, and 2 at low risk level. The highest risk level is related to the formation of sediment in the steam boiler, which leads to higher fuel consumption and air pollution. soil contamination resulting from the entry of wastewater from the production line and pulping unit into a soil pond for sedimentation before treatment is performed as well as Condensate flashing (conversion of the liquid phase to vapor) are also considered to be other major risks of the plant under study. By providing corrective solutions, all risks were reduced to a low-severity risk level.
Discussion: The results of the present study and a review of similar research conducted in different industries showed that conducting risk assessment studies and providing corrective actions can significantly reduce risk levels. Combining of the methods of health, safety, and environmental risk assessment by systematizing the process of identifying aspects can increase the accuracy and precision of risk assessment results. And finally, the identified solutions can be used in the form of risk management guidelines in the study area. After identifying solutions and adopting the desired strategy to control each of the risks, it will be possible to design operational scenarios appropriate to each of these strategies and in accordance with the crisis management guidelines.

Keywords

Subjects

  1. Ahmadi, A. and Rasoulzadeh, Y., 2015. Risk assessment of grass cutting tools and equipment using the PHA method. National Conference on Occupational Health and Safety.
  2. Ali Mohammadloo, M., Shaker, S., Mirghaderi, S.H., Bab Al-Hawaeji, M. and Ghorbani, M.J., 2011. Developing a Strategic Health, Safety and Environment Plan (Case Study: Ports and Maritime Organization). Strategic Management Studies, 2(8): 61-82.
  3. Alvarenga, P., Rodrigues, D., Mourinha, C., Palma, P., De Varennes, A., Cruz, N., ... and Rodrigues, S., 2019. Use of wastes from the pulp and paper industry for the remediation of soils degraded by mining activities: Chemical, biochemical and ecotoxicological effects. Science of the Total Environment, 686, 1152-1163.
  4. Arun, N. and Palanisamy., 2019. Risk Assessment and Hazard Evaluation for Paper Industries. International Journal of Engineering and Techniques.
  5. Bandarja, M. and Jozi, S.A., 2013. Health, safety and environmental risk assessment of the hydrocracker unit of Bandar Abbas Oil Refining Company using EFMEA method. Environment, 39(4(68)): 105-124.
  6. Belji-Kangarloo, M., Naebi-Taheri, M., Dehdashti, A., Fatemi, F. and Basharatzadeh, A., 2021. Risk assessment of occupational health and safety hazards using the occupational safety analysis method: a case study of the steel industry. Preventive Medicine, 8(4): 25-35
  7. Blivband, Z., Grabov, P. and Nakar, O., 2004. Expanded fmea (efmea). In Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004-RAMS (pp. 31-36). IEEE.
  8. Cheremisinoff, P., 2018. Air pollution control and design for industry. Routledge.
  9. Dixit, M., Gupta, GK., Liu, H. and Shukia, P., 2019. Pulp and Paper Industry based Pollutants, their Health Hazards and Environmental Risks, Journal Pre-proof.
  10. Domínguez, R., Gomez, C. and Cerezo, O., 2021. Risk Analysis based on ETA, FTA and Bowtie methodologies for the bulk coal discharge process. In Advances in Safety Management and Human Performance: Proceedings of the AHFE 2021 Virtual Conferences on Safety Management and Human Factors, and Human Error, Reliability, Resilience, and Performance, July 25-29, 2021, USA (pp. 193-199). Springer International Publishing.
  11. Ehrampoosh, M., Halvani, G., Ghaneian, M., Dehghani, A., Shafiei, M. and Arani, M., 2017. Identifying environmental hazards of Kavir Steel hot rolling industry equipment using the What if method and assessing its risk using the William Fine method. Specialized Scientific Quarterly Journal of Occupational Medicine, 9(1): 84-95.
  12. Ghaderi, S., Rahimi, A., Hedayatifar, M. and Arabnajafi, S.M., 2015. Environmental Risk Assessment and Management of Tehran Metro and Suburbs Using EFMEA Method (Case Study: Sadeghieh Terminal). Environmental Science and Technology, 17(2(Issue 65)): 61-71.
  13. Grötzner, M., Melchiors, E., Schroeder, L.H., dos Santos, A.R., Moscon, K.G., de Andrade, M.A., ... and Xavier, C.R., 2018. Pulp and paper mill effluent treated by combining coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation and Fenton processes. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 229, 1-7.
  14. Gupta, G.K. and Shukla, P., 2020. Insights into the resources generation from pulp and paper industry wastes: challenges, perspectives and innovations. Bioresource technology, 297, 122496.
  15. Hemmatinia, S., Rezaian, S. and Jozi, A., 2020. Environmental risk assessment of development projects of the Urban Services Department of District 19 of Tehran Municipality using the localized EFMEA method. Journal of Sustainability, Development and Environment, 3(2): 69-82.
  16. Ince, B.K., Cetecioglu, Z. and Ince, O., 2011. Pollution prevention in the pulp and paper industries. Environmental Management in Practice, 5, 224-246.
  17. Jaworska, H., Matuszczak, K. and Różański, S., 2020. Impact of pulp and paper industry on the content of selected elements in soils and plants. Catena, 193, 104579.
  18. Jozi, S.A., Gliji, N. and Mohammadfam, A., 2011. Environmental risk assessment and management of the polyethylene unit of Ariasassol Polymer Company using EFMEA method. Natural Resources Sciences and Technologies, 6(4): 147-159.
  19. Jozi, S.A., Hosseini, S.M. and Tabib Shushtari, M., 2010. Environmental risk assessment of the Balaroud Dam in Khuzestan during the construction phase using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Marine Science and Technology Research, 5(1): 71-88.
  20. Kahmark, K.A. and Unwin, J.P., 1999. Pulp and paper effluent management. Water environment research, 71(5), 836-852.
  21. Khairkhah, J. and Amiri, M., 2019. Environmental risk assessment of the Songun copper mine tailings dam using the EFMEA method. Geography and Environmental Hazards, 8(32): 173-189.
  22. Kong, L., Hasanbeigi, A. and Price, L., 2016. Assessment of emerging energy-efficiency technologies for the pulp and paper industry: a technical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 122, 5-28.
  23. Laribaghal, M., Haghighifard, N. and Rafiei, M., 2011. Application of FMEA in Environmental Risk Assessment: The Case of Dredging of Imam Khomeini Port Piers. Quarterly Scientific-Research Journal of Wetlands/ Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch, 3(9): 3-14.
  24. Mangla, S.K., Kumar, P. and Barua, M.K., 2016. An integrated methodology of FTA and fuzzy AHP for risk assessment in green supply chain. International Journal of Operational Research, 25(1), 77-99.
  25. Martin, N., Anglani, N., Einstein, D., Khrushch, M., Worrell, E. and Price, L.K., 2000. Opportunities to improve energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the US pulp and paper industry.
  26. Moghadami, S., Abedinzadeh, N., Khommami, M., 2015. Prioritizing the environmental risk assessment of the construction of the Anzali Free Zone wharf using Analytic Hierarchy Process and topsis Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 2(2): 35-44.
  27. Molavivardanjani, R.A., Rafati, M. and Zaimdar, M., 2020. Performance evaluation of health, safety and environmental management system in Pegah Shahr-e-Kord powdered milk factory using balanced scorecard approach. Environmental Science and Technology, 22(9(100)): 115-125.
  28. Pourmirza, S.A., Bahrami, S. and Eidi, H., 2020. Investigating factors affecting the improvement of health, safety and environmental culture in sports venues. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 9(2): 83-96.
  29. Qi, Z., Wang, H., Zhao, X. and Chen, J., 2020. April. The occupational hazard risk assessment method based on PHA and risk matrix. In 2020 International Conference on Urban Engineering and Management Science (ICUEMS) (pp. 684-687). IEEE.
  30. Roszak, M., Spilka, M. and Kania, A., 2015. Environmental failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA)–a new approach to methodology. Metalurgija, 54(2), pp.449-451.
  31. Simão, L., Hotza, D., Raupp-Pereira, F., Labrincha, J.A. and Montedo, O.R.K., 2018. Wastes from pulp and paper mills-a review of generation and recycling alternatives. Cerâmica, 64, 443-453.
  32. Sun, M., Wang, Y., Shi, L. and Klemeš, J.J., 2018. Uncovering energy use, carbon emissions and environmental burdens of pulp and paper industry: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 92, 823-833.
  33. Turner, T., Wheeler, R. and Oliver, I.W., 2022. Evaluating land application of pulp and paper mill sludge: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 317, 115439.
  34. Zhamtekhkash, F., Kiani Sadr, M. and Cheraghi, M., 2022. Environmental Risk Assessment of Steel Factory Using ANP and TOPSIS Methods (Case Study: Vian Steel Factory, Hamadan). Environmental Science and Technology, 24(3 (118th Consecutive Issue): 157-169.