Development and Optimization of an Eco-Friendly Mulch Based on Minerals and Molasses for Stabilizing Sand Dunes – A Case Study in the Aran and Bidgol Sand Fields

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Human Environment Group, College of Environment, Karaj, Iran

2 Research Group of Environmental engineering and pollution monitoring, Research center for Environment and Sustainable Development, Department of Environment, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Reclamation of Arid and Mountainous Region, Natural Resources Faculty, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

4 Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

10.22034/envj.2025.539207.1535
Abstract
Introduction: Wind erosion is one of the major environmental challenges in arid and semi-arid regions of Iran, particularly in desert areas such as Aran and Bidgol and Kashan, where low precipitation, poor vegetation cover, and fragile soils intensify the phenomenon. Mulching is a common method for stabilizing mobile sands; however, petroleum-based mulches are limited due to high costs and adverse environmental impacts. Accordingly, bio-based mulches derived from agricultural and industrial by-products are considered safe, biodegradable, and cost-effective alternatives. The present study aimed to develop an eco-friendly mulch based on zeolite, bentonite, and molasses (a by-product of the sugar industry).
Materials and Methods: The research was conducted at the laboratory scale using a D-Optimal mixture design approach. Sand samples were collected from the deserts of Kashan and characterized according to ASTM standards. The proposed mulch was formulated from calcium bentonite (mesh 200), micronized clinoptilolite zeolite, and concentrated industrial molasses. The mixing ratios were designed and tested using DX11 software. Five performance indices were used to evaluate mulch quality: shear strength (SS), compressive strength (CS), impact resistance (IR), abrasion resistance (AR), and crust thickness (CT). The experimental results were analyzed using ANOVA, Duncan’s test, and Pearson and Spearman correlation analyses. Polynomial models were developed to fit the responses and determine the optimal formulation through mathematical optimization.
Results: ANOVA results showed that mulch treatments had significant effects (p < 0.05) on all performance indices. Maximum shear strength was recorded in treatments 28, 14, and 15, at 8.27, 8.20, and 8.17 N/cm², respectively. The highest compressive strength was observed in treatments 1 and 15, at 3.17 and 3.15 kg/cm², respectively. The greatest impact resistance was found in treatments 15, 28, 33, and 18, with values of 0.75, 0.71, 0.71, and 0.71, respectively. The highest abrasion resistance (value = 1) was recorded across treatments 4, 2, 9, 19, 21, 22, 24, 29, 26, and 30. Maximum crust thickness was obtained in treatments 21, 16, and 30, at 1.92, 1.91, and 1.89 cm, respectively. A strong and significant correlation was found between shear, compressive, and impact strength, while abrasion resistance showed weak and insignificant correlations with the other variables. The optimized mulch formulation aimed at maximizing SS, CS, IR, and CT consisted of 50% molasses, 23% bentonite, and 27% zeolite. Model validation results indicated a good agreement between experimental data and model predictions.
Discussion: Molasses, due to its adhesive properties and ability to bind soil particles, combined with bentonite as a calcium source for improved water retention and zeolite for its high cation exchange capacity, resulted in the development of a sustainable mulch with favorable physical and mechanical properties. Increasing molasses content directly enhanced mechanical strengths and crust thickness. Zeolite was more effective in improving abrasion resistance, whereas bentonite played a key role in impact resistance and crust thickness. The findings are consistent with previous studies. The proposed optimized formulation, due to its accessible raw materials, simple preparation process, non-toxicity, and potential for field application, can serve as an effective alternative to petroleum-based mulches in Iran’s desert regions. However, final performance validation requires field trials under actual climatic conditions. This study serves as a successful example of synergizing natural materials and industrial residues to develop environmentally focused technologies within a circular economy framework.

Keywords

Subjects

1.     Abbasi, N., Movahedan, M. and Keramati Toroghi, M., 2010. The effects of chemical Polymer on physical and mechanial properties of soils.
2.     Alipur, H., Zare, M. and Shojaei, S., 2016. Assessing the degradation of vegetation of arid zones using FAO–UNIP model case study: Kashan zone. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2(4), pp.1-6.
3.     Arabi Aliabad, F., Shojaei, S., Zare, M. and Ekhtesasi, M.R., 2019. Assessment of the fuzzy ARTMAP neural network method performance in geological mapping using satellite images and Boolean logic. International journal of environmental science and technology, 16(7), pp.3829-3838.
4.     ASTM D1558-99. 1999. Standard Test Method for Moisture Content Penetration Resistance Relationships of Fine-Grained Soils, ASTM International West Conshohocken, PA.
5.     ASTM D4648/D4648M-24a. 2010. Standard Test Method for Laboratory Miniature Vane Shear Test for Saturated Fine-Grained Soils, ASTM International West Conshohocken, PA.
6.     Ayoubi, S., Mosaddeghi, M. and Besalatpour, A.A., 2018. Investigating the application of biochar, bentonite clay and polyvinyl acetate polymer on some mechanical properties of sand deposits. Agricultural Engineering (Scientific Journal of Agriculture), 41(2), pp.83-97.
7.     Azimi, Y., Zare, S., Sarkheil, H., Bodaghjamali, J. and Heshmati, S., 2018. Construction of cement-slag mulch using mixture experiments design for fixation of sand dunes. Journal of Range and Watershed Managment, 71(3), pp.715-735.
8.     Barati, M., Moazami, M.A. and Ostadhosseini, A., 2025. The Efect of Mulch in Controlling Erosion and Dust Originated From Chadormalu Iron Mine Tailings. Advanced Environmental Sciences, 23(3), pp.617-636.
9.     Code No. 783. 2019. Technical Instructions for Evaluating Performance of Soil stabilizers mulch. Plan and Budget Organization., , Islamic Republic of Iran No. 783,2019.
10. Diouf, B., Skidmore, E.L., Layton, J.B. and Hagen, L.J., 1990. Stabilizing fine sand by adding clay: laboratory wind tunnel study. Soil technology, 3(1), pp.21-31.
11. Dong, Z., Wang, L. and Zhao, S., 2008. A potential compound for sand fixation synthesized from the effluent of pulp and paper mills. Journal of arid environments, 72(7), pp.1388-1393.
12. Duncan, D.B., 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11(1), pp.1-42.
13. Emami, H., Karimi, A. and Mina, M., 2021. Evaluation the efficiency of different mulches to combat wind erosion of sandy soil running title: Efficiency of different mulches to control wind erosion. Sustainable Earth Trends, 1(1), pp.20-26.
14. Ghafari, E., Costa, H. and Júlio, E., 2015. Statistical mixture design approach for eco-efficient UHPC. Cement and Concrete Composites, 55, pp.17-25.
15. Giugliano, D., Ceriello A. and Esposito, K., 2006. The effects of diet on inflammation: emphasis on the metabolic syndrome. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 484: 677-685.
16. Hanjie, W.A.N.G., de Vries Frits, P. and Yongcan, J.I.N., 2009. A win-win technique of stabilizing sand dune and purifying paper mill black-liquor. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 21(4), pp.488-493.
17. Hazirei, F. and Zare, E.M., 2013. Investigation of effect of clay-lime mulch for sand dunes fixation. Journal of Water and Soil (Agricultural Sciences and Technology), 27(2), pp.373-380.
18.  Ippolito, J.A., Tarkalson, D.D. and Lehrsch, G.A., 2011. Zeolite soil application method affects inorganic nitrogen, moisture, and corn growth. Soil science, 176(3), pp.136-142.
19. James, J., 2020. Sugarcane press mud modification of expansive soil stabilized at optimum lime content: Strength, mineralogy and microstructural investigation. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 12(2), pp.395-402.
20. Jamili, T., Khalili, M.B. and Shahbazi, E., 2016. Investigation of water holding capacity of sugarcane mulch for sand dune stabilization in Ahvaz. Journal of Water and Soil (Agricultural Sciences and Technology), 29(5), pp.1278-1287.
21. Jamshidsafa, M., Khalili Moghadam, B., Jafari, S. and Ghorbani, S., 2015. Feasibility investigation of FilterCake using in mulch production for sand dune stabilization in Ahvaz. Agricultural Engineering, 38(1), pp.29-42.
22. Javiz, E., Jalalian, A., Mosaddeghi, M.R., Chavoshi, E. and Honarjoo, N., 2023. Assessment of wind erosion and physical and mechanical properties of bentonite clay mulch in an arid region. Journal of Arid Environments, 213, p.104974.
23. Komaei, A., Soroush, A., Fattahi, S.M. and Ghanbari, H., 2023. Wind erosion control using alkali-activated slag cement: Experimental investigation and microstructural analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 344, p.118633.
24. Liang, J., Ning, R., Sun, Z., Liu, X., Sun, W. and Zhou, X., 2021. Preparation and characterization of an eco-friendly dust suppression and sand-fixation liquid mulching film. Carbohydrate Polymers, 256, p.117429.
25. MacArthur, E., 2013. Towards the circular economy. Journal of industrial ecology, 2(1), pp.23-44.
26. Mirabedini, S.M., Jamali, S.S., Haghayegh, M., Sharifi, M., Mirabedini, A.S. and Hashemi-Nasab, R., 2012. Application of mixture experimental design to optimize formulation and performance of thermoplastic road markings. Progress in Organic Coatings, 75(4), pp.549-559.
27. Khalili Moghadam, B., Jamili, T., Nadian, H. and Shahbazi, E., 2016. The influence of sugarcane mulch on sand dune stabilization in Khuzestan, the southwest of Iran. Iran Agricultural Research, 34(2), pp.71-80.
28. MolaAbasi, H., 2016. Evaluation of zeolite effect on strength of babolsar sand stabilized with cement using unconfined compression test. Modares Civil Engineering journal, 16(5), pp.203-213.
29. Mombeni, M., Asgari, H.R., Behbahani, A.M., Zare, S. and Yousefi, H., 2021. Effect of bagasse lignocellulose microfibers on sand stabilization: A laboratory study. Aeolian Research, 49, p.100654.
30. Mombeni, M., Asgari, H.R., Mohammadian, B.A., Zare, S. and Yousefi, H., 2020. Investigation of mechanical behavior of inflatable sand using malass and black liqueur. Journal of Range and Watershed Management (Iranian Journal of Natural Resources), 72(4), pp.1061-1073.
31. Montgomery, D.C., 2017. Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, USA, p.103.
32. Moosavi, M., Moradian, S., Bastani, S. and Jalili, M., 2012. The use of experimental design for optimizing the photostabilization of a substrate printed by a water-based overprint clear coat. Journal of Color Science and Technology, 6(1), pp.1-8.
33. Movahedan, M., Abbasi, N. and Keramati, M., 2012. Wind erosion control of soils using polymeric materials. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, 1(2), pp.81-86.
34. Noori, M., Ahmadi, A. and Zendehdel, M., 2007. Comparative study between using natural and synthetic zeolites for the improvement of soil salinity and crop yield. Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry, 89(2), pp.233-241.
35. Osman, K.T., 2018. Sandy soils. In Management of soil problems (pp. 37-65). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
36. Sabzi, M., Asgari, H.R. and Afzali, S.F., 2018. Assessment sugar factories wastes’ performance on wind erosion control. Pollution, 4(3), pp. 539-546.
37. Safaei Gahnaviyeh, A.R., Karim-zadeh, H. and Shakraki, R., 2012. F. Use of steel manufacturing slag (Foulad Mobarake Co.) as mulch to stabilize wind eroded sediment case study: Soils in East of Isfahan. Environ. Erosion Res. J, 2(2), pp.15-24.
38. Soleimani, M., Mirjani, M., Ahmed, A., Khalilimoghadam, B., Cruz, M.D. and Christensen, J.H., 2025. Long-term effects of petroleum mulch on concentration, health, and ecological risks of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sand dune soils of Khuzestan province, Iran. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 32(3), pp.1430-1446.
39. Wang, J., Hu, X., Zhao, Y., Li, X., Zhao, P. and Guo, Y., 2024. Effects of molasses-based microbial dust suppressant on soil dust and microbial community. Powder Technology, 441, p.119831.
40. Xiao, C., Bolton, R. and Pan, W.L., 2007. Lignin from rice straw Kraft pulping: Effects on soil aggregation and chemical properties. Bioresource technology, 98(7), pp.1482-1488.
41. Xu, Y., Wu, Y., Ma, B., Zhang, Y., Fan, Y., Huang, X. and Liu, Z., 2025. Performance evaluation and application of second-generation environmentally-friendly composite dust suppressant in dust control. Scientific Reports 151: 4450.
42. Yan, J., Yang, F., Zhang, W., Li, P., Zhou, W., Lu, X. and Li, K., 2025. Characterization of road dust and formulation of a molasses-based dust suppressant for heavy-duty haul roads in open-pit coal mine. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 16(9), p.102589.
43. Zare, S., Mohammadi, J., Mombeni, M., Shokohi, R. and Ghoohestani, G., 2021. Effect of different mulches on some physical and mechanical properties of Aeolian soil.
44. Zhou, G., Zhao, M., Yao, J., Dao, V.D., Li, S., Wang, H., Li, J. and Liu, B., 2025. Environmental application of molasses-based foam dust suppressant: Preparation, performance evaluation and mechanism analysis. Construction and Building Materials, 458, p.139541.