Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Shahid Bakri Higher Education Center, Urmia University, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: The concept “social capital” was proposed by experts after the topic of “sustainable development” was raised in the last decades of the 20th century. The central concept of social capital is that social interactions create social networks, strengthen trust, form values, support norms and culture, and create community. Social capital and its components influence many people's views, attitudes and behaviors of environmental protection. Environmental protection behavior is also called pro-environmental behavior. The purpose of this research is to measure the amount of social capital of farmers and its effect on their Pro-Environmental Behavioral Tendencies (PEBT). The purpose of this research is to measure the extent of social capital of farmers and its effect on their PEBT.
Materials and methods: This research was done with a quantitative paradigm and survey method. The statistical population included all farmers of Urmia, 184 of them were selected by random sampling. The research tool was a researcher-made questionnaire, whose validity was confirmed by 4 related faculty members of Urmia University and its reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.75 to 0.83). Data were collected by interview technique and analyzed with SPSS version 26 software and by using one-sample and two-sample t tests, regression modeling and path analysis.
Results: The findings showed that in overall, the extent of social capital among farmers is lower than average. The results of the components of social capital also showed that internal social capital includeing, trust in the internal society, social cohesion, participation and interaction with the internal society (internal relations network) were significantly higher than the average, but external social capital including, trust in the external society, trust in public, civil, and private institutions, and the interaction of the villagers with the external society (external relations network) is significantly lower than the average. Overwhelming majority (95%) of farmers had destructive environmental behavioral tendencies. The variables of trust in social institutions, external relations network, the educational levels of farmers and their children (ELFCH), and using extension publications and the Internet have a significant positive relationship, and the variables of age and number of children have a significant negative relationship with PEBT. In addition, the level of PEBT among urban farmers with non-agricultural occupations is higher than rural farmers with agricultural occupations. The variables of the external relations network and ELFCH, explain more than 15% of the changes in farmers' PEBT, and the two variables of ELFCH play a moderating role.
Discussion: Based on the results, it is suggested that the agricultural governmental and non-govermental organizations put transparency and accountability and fight against corruption in their work priorities in order to strengthen trust and social capital. By making policies, creating a suitable market for organic products and formulating suitable mechanisms, the agricultural governmental organization should drive the behavior of farmers towards pro-environmental behavior. At the same time, using extension channels, agricultural extension officiers should try to provide more information and training, especially for the elderly farmers, and do not forget this group because most of these farmers are subsistence, small-scale and traditional farmers, and extension training should be a priority for this group. Finally, the development of human resources in rural areas should continue at a faster pace so that by improving the education level of farmers, their behaviors will be directed towards environmentally friendly behaviors.

Keywords

  1. Abadi, B., Jalali, M., Musavi, S.B., 2017. The Path Analysis of Water Conservation Behavior in Agricultural Sector and Revivification of Lake Urmia: The Case of Farmers in Southern Basin of Lake Urmia. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 13, 2, 251-268.
  2. Aghili, S.M., Khoushfar, G.R., Salehi, S., 2009. Social Capital and Environmental Responsible Behaviours in the North of Iran (Case Study: Gilan, Mazandaran and Golestan Provinces).
    Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 16, 1, 235-250.
  3. Ahmadi, M., 2017. Analysis of the effects of social capital in environmental ethics villagers A Case Study: Chaypareh Bala district, Zanjan Township. Geography and Planning, 21, 61, 19-35.
  4. Akbarian Ronizi, S.R. and Ramezanzadeh Lasboyee, M., 2019. Farmers’ Resilience against Drought with an Emphasis on Economic Factors and Social Capital in Rural Areas: A Case Study of Roniz in Estahban County. Journal of Rural Research,10, 2, 230-243. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2018.230885.1090.
  5. Azkia, M. and Firuzabadi, S.A., 2008. Social Capital, Land Use Systems, and Peasants Cooperative Production. Sociological Review,16, 33, 17-98.
  6. Bondori, A., Bagheri, A. and Sookhtanlou, M., 2020. Investigating the Environmental Behavior of Farmers on the Use of Agricultural Pesticides in Moghan Plain. Human and Environment, 18, 2, 67-84.
  7. De Krom, M.P., 2017. Farmer participation in agri-environmental schemes: Regionalisation and the role of bridging social capital. Land Use Policy, 60, 352-361.
  8. Doostmohammadi, H. and Alavian, M., 2019. The Analysis of Social Capital Condition in Iran, in Bass of Post Modernism Theories of Michel Foucault. Biquarterly Journal of Sociology of Social Institutions, 6, 13, 39-66. doi: 10.22080/ssi.2019.13637.1378
  9. Fatemi, M., Rezaei-Moghaddam, K., Monfared, N. and Moghaddas Farimani, S., 2018. Factors Affecting Behavioral Change toward Organic Agriculture (The Case of Farmers of Bushehr Province). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 49, 4, 779-796. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2018.245092.668515
  10. Ghanbari, R., Shakarami, J., Sepahvand, F. and Asadpouriuan, Z., 2018. Analysis of protective behavior of Khoram Abad Township farmers in pesticide use: Applying health belief model. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 49, 1, 121-133. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2017.234453.668436
  11. Gheyassi, A., Sarani, V. and Paryab, J., 2017. Social Capital & Environmental Ethics among Farmers. Ethics in Science and Technolog, 11, 4, 49-60.
  12. Habibpour Gatabi, K. and Safari Shali, R., 2020. Comprehensive Manual for Using SPSS in Survey Researches. Louyeh Press, Tehran, Iran.
  13. Hazbavi, A. and Mohamadi, S., 2014. Sociological study of the relationship between social capital with environmental responsible behavior. Quarterly journal of disciplinary knowledge of Khuzestan, 3, 7, 42-67.
  14. Ishihara, H. and Pascual, U., 2009. Social capital in community level environmental governance: A critique. Ecological Economics, 68, 5, 1549-1562.
  15. Jafarinia, J., 2020. Investigating the Impact of Social Capital on Citizens' Environmental Behaviors (Case Study: City Bushehr. Regional Planning10, 37, 141-150. doi: 1001.1.22516735.1399.10.37.10.8.
  16. Kabiri, A. and Karimzadeh, S., 2017. Sociological analysis of the relationship between social capital and environmental concerns. Journal of Applied Sociology, 28, 1, 53-66. doi: 10.22108/jas.2017.21250
  17. Kanani, E. and Ahmadvand, M., 2019. Explaining Environmental Behavior of Wheat Farmers: Application of Value-Belief-Norm Theory. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 7, 3, 35-46. doi: 10.30473/ee.2019.5806
  18. Klöckner, C.A., 2013. A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—A meta-analysis. Global environmental change, 23, 5, 1028-1038.
  19. Masoudizadeh1, F., Rezvanfar, A. and Movahed Mohammadi, H., 2016. The Role of Social capital Components on Environmental Non- Governmental Organizations’ Performance: Case of Khuzestan Province. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 4, 4, 40-33.
  20. Mohammadzadeh, S., Sadighi, H. and Pezeshki Rad, G., 2014. Modeling the Process of Drip Irrigation System Adoption by Apple Orchardists in the Barandooz River Basin of Urmia Lake Catchment, Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 16, 6, 1253-1266.
  21. Poder, T.G., 2011. What is really social capital? A critical review. The American Sociologist, 42, 4, 341-367.
  22. Sabzian Molaee K.Ajili, A., Mohammadzade, S.and Yazdanpanah, M., Frozani, M., Examine the attitudes and behaviors of farmers to apply integrated pest management by using the developed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 8, 2, 57-70.
  23. Salehi, S. and Emamgholi, L., 2013. Effect of Social Capital on Environmental Behavior Case Study: Kurdistan Province. Iranian Journal of Sociology, 13, 4, 90-115.
  24. Seifi, R., Chizari, M. and Abbasi, E., 2018. Factors Affecting Framers’ Soil Conservation Behavior in West Azerbaijan Province: A Cultural Approach. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 13, 2, 219-234.
  25. Shafiee, F., Rezvanfar, A. and Sadat Mirtorabi, M., 2018. Investigation of Farmers’ Environmental Behavior Components about Bio-Fertilizers Application (The Case of Alborz Province). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 20, 1, 105-118. doi: 10.22034/jest.2018.12483
  26. Sharifi, Z. and Nouripour, M., 2016. Analysis of the Relationship between Social Capital and Environmental Attitudes of the Rural People: The Case of the Central District of Dena County. Journal of Iranian Social Development Studies, 8, 4, 7-19.
  27. Wan, Q. and Du, W., 2022. Social Capital, Environmental Knowledge, and Pro-Environmental Behavior. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1443. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph19031443
  28. Wang, Y., Xiong, J., Li, W., Na, M. and Yao, M., 2020. The effect of social capital on environmental pollution in China—Suppression or Promotion? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 24, 9459.
  29. Woolcock, M. and Narayan, D., 2000. Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank research observer, 15, 2, 225-249.
  30. Yazdani, H. and Shams, A., 2016. The Effect of Social Capital on the Environmental Behavior of Villagers in Marivan City. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 4, 4, 86-75.
  31. Zhou, J., Liu, Q. and Liang, Q., 2018. Cooperative membership, social capital, and chemical input use: Evidence from China. Land Use Policy, 70, 394-401.