Application of Rapid Impacts Assessment Matrix (RIAM) in Detecting Environmental Impacts of Chabahar Desalination Plant

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran

Abstract
Introduction: With the shortage of freshwater resources, the use of other available sources such as seas and oceans has increased, and new technologies in the field of desalination and treatment of saline waters have gained attention. The territorial waters of the Oman Sea and the Persian Gulf have created strong potential for the establishment of desalination plants for various uses in Iran. The sustainable development of desalination units requires adherence to environmental standards to prevent the increase of pollutants in the effluent. The Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) Method is a way to organize, analyze, and present the results of a comprehensive environmental assessment. The present study aimed to identify the positive and negative effects resulting from the operation of the Chabahar desalination plant during the operational phase on four environmental components (biological-ecological, physical-chemical, economic-operational, and social-cultural).
Materials and Methods: After identifying the various phases of the project through library studies and gathering information from different sources, the components and elements of the environment in the affected area were examined and identified, categorized into four physical-chemical, biological-ecological, social-cultural, and economic-operational environments. Then, the effects of the Chabahar desalination plant's activities were assessed using RIAM during the operational phase. To this end, after identifying the various phases of this industrial unit, four components were identified and examined. The use of these four categories can serve as a suitable tool for environmental impact assessment studies, as it seems that each category can have subcategories for identifying environmental components, allowing for a more detailed and better analysis of the project's effects on different sectors. After the environmental components affected by the available options have been scored, the final score obtained indicates the environmental status of the project's activities.
Results: The results showed that the most destructive consequences, with a score of -108, were related to the physical-chemical environment, while the most positive effects, with a score of +84, were in the social-cultural environment. In the physical-chemical environment section, this project has significant negative impacts on the region's environment. Given the project's proximity to the Sea of Oman and coral islands that host unique species and valuable ecosystem services, it is necessary to evaluate strategies to eliminate the negative effects resulting from changes in water quality and to minimize them. In the biological-ecological section, the most significant negative effects are on the fauna. The Chabahar desalination plant, in its operational phase, has 11 positive effects and 9 negative effects. Considering that this complex is a significant source of drinking water for the region and has meaningful positive impacts in the economic and social sectors, the continuation of its activities is permissible as long as environmental protection measures are observed.   
Discussion: It is necessary to reduce the intensity of their effects by implementing corrective actions and monitoring environmental parameters at the wastewater disposal site, as well as continuously measuring the output pollutants in the surrounding environment and comparing them with national and international standards. The positive effects, due to being categorized as having very little change or positive effect, little change or positive effect, and change or positive effect, indicate the preference for carrying out the project over not doing it.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. Abbaspour, F. and Mohammadi, M., 2020. Comparison and Environmental Impact Assessment of soil and stone mines in the city of Qaen by the RIAM matrix. Journal of Natural Environment, 73(3): 543-556.
  2. Ameri, M. and Seyd Eshaghi, M., 2016. A novel configuration of reverse osmosis, humidification- dehumidification and flat plate collector: Modeling and exergy analysis. Applied Thermal Engineering, 103: 855-873.
  3. Ameri, M., Sadri, S. and Haghighi Khoshkhoo, R., 2017. Multi-objective optimization of MED-TVC-RO hybrid desalination system based on the irreversibility concept. Desalination, (402), 97-108.
  4. Bahadori Amjaz, F., Morovati, M. and Bemani, A., 2020. Assessing the environmental effects of urban waste landfill and its interaction with the environment: A case study of Yazd city in 2017. Health and Development Journal, 9: 87-105.
  5. Balist, J., chehrazar, F. and Mohamadi Bigdeli, S., 2015. Environmental impact assessment of wastewater treatment using RIAM (pastakia) (case study: DEZFOL wastewater treatment plant). the 1st International Environment and natural Resources conference- IENC2015, 7september, 2015, kharazmi Higher Institute of science & technology, shiraz, Iran.
  6. Eyl-Mazzega, M.A. and Cassignol, É., 2022. The Geopolitics of Seawater Desalination, Études de l’Ifri, IFPRI, September 2022. 
  7. Ebadi, M., Khalilipour, O., Dadolahi Sohrab, A., Mohammad Asgari, H. and Khazaei, S., 2020. Environmental impact assessment of Yard Vali-Asr Jetty using Leoplod corrected matrix and RIAM matrix. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 18(4): 1-17.
  8. Eke, J., Yusuf, A., Giwa, A. and Sodiq, A., 2020. The global status of desalination: An assessment of current desalination technologies, plants and capacity. Desalination, 495: 114633.
  9. Gheshlaghi, P., Kamrani, E., Naji, A. and Daliri, M., 2022. Impacts of the seawater desalination plants' discharges on survival and ionic balance of blue swimmer crab, Portunus segnis (Forskal, 1775), in the northern Persian Gulf. Iranian Journal of Health and Environment, 15(2):245-60.
  10. Gheybi, M.J., Chehreghani, S., Azimi Youshanlouie, M. and Darvishi Qulunji, Z., 2022. Investigation of landfill environmental effects of municipal waste in Urmia city using rapid assessment matrix method (RIAM). Environmental Sciences. 20(3): 117-136.
  11. Gholamalifard, M., Mirzaei, M., Hatamimanesh, M., Riyahi Bakhtiari, A.R. and Sadeghi, M., 2014. Application of rapid impacts assessment matrix and Iranian matrix in environmental impact assessment of municipal solid waste landfill of Shahrekord. Journal of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, 16: 31-46.
  12. Gilbuena, R., Kawamura, A., Medina, R., Amaguchi, H., Nakagawa, N. and Bui, D.D., 2013. Environmental impact assessment of structural flood mitigation measures by a rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) technique: a case study in Metro Manila, Philippines. Science of Total Environment,456-457.
  13. Heck, N., Petersen, K.L., Potts, D.C., Haddad, B. and Paytan, A., 2018. Predictors of coastal stakeholders' knowledge about seawater desalination impacts on marine ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment, 639, 785-792.
  14. Ibrahim, H.D., Xue, P. and Eltahir, E.A., 2020. Multiple salinity equilibria and resilience of Persian/Arabian Gulf basin salinity to brine discharge. Frontiers in Marine Science :573.
  15. Ihsanullah, I., Atieh, M.A., Sajid, M. and Nazal, M.K., 2021. Desalination and environment: A critical analysis of impacts, mitigation strategies, and greener desalination technologies. Science of The Total Environment, 780:146585.
  16. Ljäs, A., Kuitunen, M. and Jalava, K., 2010. Developing the RIAM method (rapid impact assessment matrix) in the context of impact significance assessment. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 30(2), 82-90.
  17. Korozi, O. and Vagiona, D.G., 2024. Environmental Impact Assessment of Onshore Wind Farms in the Region of Central Greece Using a Modified RIAM Method. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 6(1): 71-82.
  18. Mirzaee, M., Mahini, S., Rasool, A. and Mirkarimi, S., 2016. Site selection of compost plant alternatives using rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) (case study: compost plant of Golpayegan city). Geographical Researches Quarterly Journal, 31(1):103-17.
  19. Mondal, M.K. and Dasgupta, B.V., 2010. EIA of municipal solid waste disposal site in Varanasi using RIAM analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54, 541–546.
  20. Movahed, E. and Abedi, Z., 2017. Determination of Water Pollution Damage Caused by Desalinators in the South Pars Special Zone. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 3(2): 1-8.
  21. Namdari, Z., Rezaeian, S. and Jafarzade Haghighifard N., 2013. Environmental Effects of Brick Kilns Factories, Ghohab Area of Esfahan, Iran. Journal of Environmental Studies, 39(3): 117-132.
  22. Neamtu, R., Sluser, B., Plavan, O. and Teodosiu, C., 2021. Environmental monitoring and impact assessment of Prut River cross-border pollution. Environmental monitoring assessment, 193: 340.
  23. Pahlavani, A. and Jafari, E., 2023. Environmental impact Assessment of the railway construction and operation with emphasis on the fast matrix (Case study: Sabzevar antenna project to Mashhad – Tehran railway). Journal of Arid Regions Geographic Studies 14(51): 82-98.
  24. Padash, A., 2017. Modeling of environmental impact assessment based on RIAM and TOPSIS for desalination and operating units. Environmental Energy and Economic Research. 1(1): 75-88.
  25. Panagopoulos, A., Haralambous, K.J. and Loizidou, M., 2019. Desalination brine disposal methods and treatment technologies-A review. Science of The Total Environment, 693:133545.
  26. Pastakia, C.M.R. and Jensen, A., 1998. The rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) for EIA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18: 461–482.
  27. Petersen, K.L., Paytan, A., Rahav, E., Levy, O., Silverman, J., Barzel, O., Potts, D. and Bar-Zeev, E., 2018. Impact of brine and antiscalants on reef-building corals in the Gulf of Aqaba–Potential effects from desalination plants. Water Research, 144:183-91.
  28. Phillips, J.A., 2015. quantitative-based evaluation of the environmental impact and sustainability of a proposed onshore wind farm in the United Kingdom. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49:1261-70.
  29. Pourkermani, M. and Zomorrodian, M.J., 1988. A Discussion geomorphology province (Chabahar). Geographical Research Quarterly 7, 155-156. Isfahan.
  30. Saeed, M.O., Ershath, M.I.M. and Al-Tisan, A., 2019. Perspective on desalination dischrges and coastal environments of the Arabian Peninsula. Marine Environmental Research 145: 1-10.
  31. Sayyad, H., Shahriari Moghaddam, M., Erfani, M. and Mohammadi, S., 2023. Public Attitudes toward Environmental mpacts from Seawater Desalination: Insights from Southeast Iran. Water Harvesting Research, 6: 195-202.
  32. Shakib-Manesh, T.E., Hirvonen, K.O., Jalava, K.J., Alander, T. and Kuitunen, M.T., 2014. Ranking of small-scale proposals for water system repair using the Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM). Environmental Impact Assessment Review 49: 49- 56.
  33. Upham, P. and Smith, B., 2014. Using the rapid impact assessment matrix to synthesize biofuel and bioenergy impact assessment results: the example of medium scale bioenergy heat options. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 261–269.
  34. Wilf, M. and Klinko, K., 2001. Optimization of seawater RO systems design. Desalination. 138(1-3): 299-306.