Environment and Interdisciplinary Development

Evaluation of the Ecological Security and Tourism Vulnerability in the Hara Protected Area

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Parvaneh Sobhani 1
Afshin Danehkar 2

1 Department of Environmental Science, Natural Resources Faculty, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran

2 Department of Environmental Science, Natural Resources Faculty, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22034/envj.2025.497629.1452
Abstract
Introduction: The ecological security of tourism provides a new research framework and practical tools for analyzing sustainable regional development. This facilitates the development of high-quality tourism and also protects natural ecosystems. Therefore, ecological security plays an important role in examining biological resources about society, economy, and environment and, especially concerning protected areas, can provide vital information for habitat conservation and conservation strategies. This study aimsto assess the ecological security of tourism based on the establishment of a driver framework and pressures in the Hara protected area.
Materials and Methods: In the present study, the ecological security and vulnerability of tourism were assessed based on the DPSIR model framework in the Hara protected area. Accordingly, by considering five key factors ("Driver", "Pressure", "State", "Impact", "Response"), the effective indicators on the ecological security of tourism were examined and analyzed in this protected area. For this purpose, a list of effective indicators that can affect the ecological security of tourism was prepared based on previous documents and studies and according to the opinions of specialists and experts.
Results: The results revealed that the highest ecological security of tourism is visible in the east of Khorkhoran island and the west of Sayeh Khosh habitat, especially in the central areas of mangrove forests, and in contrast, the lowest level is related to the north and south of the area around Marduv island, Khamir Lashtqan and coastal Qeshm due to the expansion of various human activities. In addition, the results of the classification of ecological tourism security showed that the Hara protected area has 68.56 percent of the ecologically safe tourism class and 32.43 percent of the unsafe class. The evaluation of the indicators affecting the ecological security of tourism also indicates that the highest score among the "drivers" is related to the increase in construction with a value of 64.3, among the "pressures" is the index of excessive harvesting of branches and feeding of wandering camels with a value of 88.4, among the "state" indicators is the level of vegetation density with a value of 22.3, among the "responses" coefficients is the prevention of branching and provision of fodder for livestock (especially camels) with a value of 18.3. According to the results, the status index in the mangrove forests of the island and the Khorkhoran Strait has the lowest value due to the limited development of human activities, while the highest state index is observed in the north, south of the region and the centers of human activity development. Also, the highest impact index is related to the surroundings of ports, commercial and tourist piers, coastal areas and tourism development centers. Accordingly, in areas that are the centers of human activity development, the driving, pressure and impact indices have increased, resulting in a decrease in ecological security in the region.
Discussion: Based on the results obtained, the most threats to the ecological security of tourism are related to uncontrolled human activities and also insufficient supervision over the development and exploitation of ports and piers in the region. Therefore, controlling these pressures and threats requires integrated planning and management at the regional level. In this regard, the results of this study can help decision-makers and planners in developing a management plan and taking strategic measures in this area by providing a range of key factors and indicators affecting the ecological security of tourism in the Hara protected area.

Keywords

Ecological Security of Tourism
DPSIR Model
Effective Ecological Indicators
Hara Protected Area

Subjects

  1. Akram, H., Hussain, S., Mazumdar, P., Chua, K.O., Butt, T.E. and Harikrishna, J.A., 2023. Mangrove Health: A Review of Functions, Threats, and Challenges Associated with Mangrove Management Practices. Forests, 14 (9), 1698.
  2. Chen, Y. and Wang, J., 2020. Ecological security early-warning in central Yunnan Province, China, ‎based on the gray model. Ecol. Indic, 111, 106000‎‏.‏
  3. Danekar, A., Azizi Jalilian, M., Lotfikhah, S., Forouzad, M., Davar, L., Samadi, B., Yaqhubzadeh, M., Mafi Gholami, D., Fayazi, S., Mashhadhi, M., Khatibi, A., Petrosian, H., Dadashizadeh, Z. and Khodam Astanehhossein, A.R., 2019. Action plan integrated management of the coastal area of Khamir city. The study plan for the integrated management of the coastal areas of Hormozgan province, Ports and Maritime Organization, Iran Construction Consulting Engineers, 382 p. (In Persian).
  4. Ehara, M., Hyakumura, K., Sato, R., Kurosawa, K., Araya, K., Sokh, H. and Kohsaka, R., 2018. ‎Addressing maladaptive coping strategies of local communities to changes in ‎ecosystem ‎service provisions using the DPSIR framework. Ecol. Econ, 49, 226–238‎‏.‏
  5. Etemadi, H., Smoak, J.M. and Abbasi, E., 2021. Spatiotemporal pattern of degradation in arid ‎mangrove forests of the Northern Persian Gulf. Oceanologia, 63 (1), 99-114.‎
  6. Gan, L., Wen, Q., Lev, B. and Jiang, W., 2023. Tourism ecological security evaluation based on dynamic super-efficiency network SBM from the perspective of all-for-one tourism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 429, 139333.
  7. Garmaeepour, R., Danehkar, A., Alizadeh Shabani, A. and Sobhani, P., 2024. Comparison and prioritization of environmental threats in natural habitats of mangrove forests of Iran. Journal of Natural Environmental Hazards, 1-1. (In Persian).
  8. He, X., Cai, C. and Shi, J., 2023. Evaluation of tourism ecological security and its driving mechanism in the Yellow River Basin, China: Based on open systems theory and DPSIR model. Systems, 11(7), 336.
  9. Heydari, M., Razaghi Borkhani, F., Azizi Khalkhili, T. and Barati, A.A., 2014. Components explaining the ecological security of rural tourism. The Fourth International Conference and the Seventh National Conference on the Protection of Natural Resources and the Environment along with the Fifth National Conference on Forestry of Iran. (In Persian).
  10. Huang, Q., Peng, B., Wei, G. and Wan, A., 2021. Dynamic assessment and early warning of ‎ecological security: a case study of the Yangtze River urban agglomeration. Nat. Hazards, ‎‎107 (3), 2441–2461‎‏.‏
  11. Jafariazar, S., Sabzghabaei, G.R., Tavakoly, M. and Dashti, S.S., 2017. Assessment and Analysis of Khur-e-khuran International Wetland Environmental Risks Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods. Irrigation Sciences and Engineering, 40(3), 63-75 (In Persian).
  12. Kabuli, M., Aliabadian, M., Tohidi Far, M., Hashemi, A.R. and Roselar, C., 2016. Bird Atlas of Iran. Academic Jahad of Alborz Province (Kharazmi), 628p (In Persian).
  13. Khan, I., Hou, F. and Le, H.P., 2021. The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and ‎population growth on environmental quality: fresh evidence from the United States of ‎ Sci. Total Environ, 754, 142222.‎
  14. Khorani, A., Biniyaz, M. and Amiri, H.R., 2015. Changes in mangrove forests level according to climatic fluctuations (case study: forests between Khamir port and Qeshm). Journal of Aquatic Ecology, 5(2), 100-111 (In Persian).
  15. Li, Y., Liu, Z. and Liu, G., 2023. Evaluation of tourism ecological security based on driving force–pressure–state–influence–response framework and analysis of its dynamic evolution characteristics and driving factors in Chinese province territory. Sustainability, 15(18), 13680.
  16. Liu, Y., Zhao, Ch., Liu, X., Chang, Y., Wang, H., Yang, J., Yang, X. and Wei, Y., 2021. The multi-dimensional perspective of ecological security evaluation and drive mechanism for Baishuijiang National Nature Reserve, China, Ecological Indicators, 132, 108295.
  17. Liu, C., Li, W., Xu, J., Zhou, H., Li, C. and Wang, W., 2022. Global trends and characteristics of ecological security research in the early 21st century: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Ecological Indicators, 137, 108734.
  18. Lu, C., Li, W., Pang, M., Xue, B. and Miao, H., 2018. Quantifying the economy-environment ‎‎interactions in tourism: case of Gansu Province, China[J]. Sustainability, 10 (3), 711‎‏.‏
  19. Mafi-Gholami, D., Baharlouii, M. and Mahmoudi, B., 2018. Erosion and accretion monitoring in mangrove forests using remote sensing and Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) (Case study: Hara Biosphere reserve). Journal of Environmental Studies, 43(4), 633-646 (In Persian).
  20. Mafi-Gholami, D., Zenner, E.K., Jaafari, A., Bakhtyari, H.R.R. and Bui, D.T., 2019. Multihazards vulnerability assessment of southern coasts of Iran. Journal of Environmental Management, 252, 109628.
  21. Novikau, A., 2021. The evolution of the natural protected areas system in Belarus: From ‎communism to authoritarianism. Glob. Ecol. Conserv, 26, e01486.‎
  22. Pham, T.D. and Yoshino, K., 2016. Impacts of mangrove management systems on mangrove changes in the Northern Coast of Vietnam. Tropics, 24 (4), 141-151.
  23. Ruan, W.Q., Li, Y.Q., Zhang, S.N. and Liu, C.H., 2019. Evaluation and drive mechanism of tourism ecological security based on the DPSIR-DEA model. Tour. Man, 75, 609–625.
  24. Saaty, T.L. and Vargas, L.G., 2012. Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic ‎Hierarchy Process. Springer Science & Business Media.‎
  25. Saaty, T.L., 2005. Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with ‎Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks. RWS publications.‎
  26. Segaran, T.C., Azra, M.N., Lananan, F., ‎Burlakovs, J., Vincevica-Gaile, Z., ‎Rudovica, V. and Satyanarayana, B., 2023. ‎Mapping the Link between ‎Climate Change and Mangrove Forest: A ‎Global Overview of the Literature. ‎Forests, 14 (2), 421. ‎doi:‎3390/f14020421.
  27. Shi, D., Guan, J., Wan, D. and Liu, J., 2024. Assessing the ecological security of tourism in Northeast China. Open Geosciences, 16(1), 20220545.
  28. Singh, M., Schwendenmann, L., Wang, ‎, Adame, M.F. and Mandlate, L.J.C., 2022. Changes in mangrove carbon ‎stocks ‎and exposure to sea level rise ‎‎(SLR) under future climate scenarios. ‎Sustainability, 14(7), 3873.‎ doi: 10.3390/su14073873.‎
  29. Sippo, J.Z., Lovelock, C.E., Santos, I.R., Sanders, C.J. and Maher, D.T., 2018. Mangrove mortality in a changing climate: An overview. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 215, 241-249.
  30. Sobhani, P. and Danehkar, A., 2023a. Assessment of environmental hazards and vulnerability of Hara protected area using DPSIR model. Environmental Management Hazards, 10(3), 215-232 (In Persian).
  31. Sobhani, P. and Danehkar, A., 2023b. Investigating the trend of land cover/land use changes and the level of ecological risk in the Hara Protected Area. Journal of Sustainable development of the geographical environment. (In Persian).
  32. Sobhani, P. and Danehkar, A., 2023c. Natural features and management areas of Khamir and Gheshm mangrove forests. Nature of Iran, 8 (4-41), 97-112 (In Persian).
  33. Sobhani, P. and Danehkar, A., 2024d. Evaluation of Natural Capital Changes and Ecological Sustainability in the Hara Protected Area. Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 14(2), 49-63 (In Persian).
  34. Sobhani, P. and Danehkar, A., 2024e. Investigating tourism climate conditions in Iran's mangrove forests using Tourism Comfort Climate Index (TCI) and Holiday Climate Index (HCI). Journal of Natural Environment, 75(Special Issue Coastal and Marine Environment), 29-45.
  35. Sobhani, P., Esmaeilzadeh, H. and Mostafavi, H., 2021. Simulation and impact assessment of ‎future land use and land cover changes in two protected areas in Tehran, Iran. Sust. Cities ‎Soc, 75, 1–11. ‎
  36. Sobhani, P., Esmaeilzadeh, H., Sadeghi, S.M.M. and Marcu, M.V., 2022. Estimation of Ecotourism ‎Carrying Capacity for Sustainable Development of Protected Areas in Iran. Int. J. Environ. ‎ Public Health, 19, 1059.‎
  37. Sobhani, P., Esmaeilzadeh, H., Wolf, I.D., Deljouei, A., Marcu, M.V. and Sadeghi, S.M.M., 2023. Evaluating the ecological security of ecotourism in protected area based on the DPSIR model. Ecological Indicators, 155, 110957.
  38. Wang, J.F., Zhang, T.L. and Fu, B.J., 2016. A measure of spatial stratified heterogeneity. ‎ ‎Indic, 67, 250–256‎‏.‏
  39. Wang, X., Xiong, J., Wang, J., Liu, M. and Zhang, J., 2024. Spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of tourism ecological adaptation in the Dongting Lake Area, China. Ecological Informatics, 80, 102459.
  40. Wei, S.M., Pan, J.H. and Liu, X., 2020. Landscape ecological safety assessment and landscape ‎pattern optimization in arid inland river basin: Take Ganzhou District as an example. Hum. ‎Ecol Ris. Ass, 26 (3), 782–806.‎
  41. Xiaobin, M., Biao, S., Guolin, Xing, Z. and Li, L., 2021. Evaluation and spatial effects of tourism ‎ecological security in the Yangtze River Delta.Ecological Indicators, 131,108190.‎
  42. Yaghoubzadeh, M., Salmanmahiny, A., Mikaeili Tabrizi, A., Danehkar, A. and Moslehi, M., 2022. Prioritizing environmental hazards of mangrove forests in Hormozgan province. Journal of Natural Environmental Hazards, 10(30), 69-82 (In Persian).
  43. Zhang, X., Wang, L., Miao, L. and Zhang, Q., 2024. Development and application of a comprehensive evaluation index system for groundwater quality evolution patterns. Environmental Research, 262, 119896.
Environment and Interdisciplinary Development
Volume 9, Issue 86
Winter 2025
Pages 27-46

Home

Submit Manuscript

Contact Us