Investigating the Causal Factors Determining Environmental Quality Indicators in Iran Using the New Approach of Bootstrap Fourier Granger Causality in Quantile (BFGC-Q)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Economic, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Economic, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Lorestan University, Khoram Abad, Iran

Abstract
Introduction: According to the statistics published by the Global Footprint Network, Iran's ecological deficit, which was 0.55 per capita global hectare in 1961, has increased by 554% to 2.50 per capita global hectare in 2022; which shows that the existing supply of natural resources in Iran is not enough to maintain the current production and consumption patterns. Based on this, the analysis of the determining factors of environmental quality indicators in Iran can provide valuable suggestions in the field of designing appropriate environmental policies. In this regard, the main goal of this study is to examine the causal determinants of environmental indicators in Iran.
Materials and Methods: The present descriptive-analytical and applied study uses time series data from 1970-2022 to examine the causal determinants of environmental indicators in Iran using two traditional indicators of CO2 emission and ecological footprint (EF) and also the new index of load capacity factor (LCF) which simultaneously considers the supply and demand of nature. Based on this, the causal effect of economic growth, natural resources dependency, urbanization, and renewable energy consumption on environmental quality indicators has been investigated by applying the new approach of Bootstrap Fourier Granger Causality in Quantile (BFGC-Q) during the years 1970-2022. Unlike previous Grangerian causality tests, this approach considers the issue of non-linearity and structural breaks and can provide useful information about a causal-tail relationship.
Results: The results show that urbanization in all quantiles (10th-90th) leads to an increase in CO2 emissions and EF and a decrease in LCF. GDP per capita in the low and middle quantiles (10th-50th) shows a negative causal relationship with LCF and a positive causal relationship with EF in the initial 10th and upper 70th quantiles. Furthermore, GDP per capita in all quantiles (10th-90th) has increased CO2 emissions. Regarding the rent of natural resources, in general, the results of this research support the neutral hypothesis and the absence of a causal relationship. Renewable energy consumption also leads to an increase in LCF in all quantiles (10th-90th) and a decrease in EF in 10th-70th quantiles. While this variable did not have a significant causal relationship with CO2 emissions in any of the quantiles.
Discussion: The results show that depending on the investigated environmental index, the effects of economic growth, dependence on natural resources, urbanization, and renewable energy consumption on ecological quality are somewhat different. Based on the results, urbanization has led to the destruction of the country's environment. Therefore, policymakers and urban planners in the process of expanding urbanization must pay attention to the prevention of environmental destruction and prioritize the correct energy consumption. The positive causal effect of GDP per capita in all quantiles on CO2 emissions shows that growth and development paths in Iran are more carbon-intensive. Therefore, efforts should be made to achieve higher economic growth, which requires the use of more energy as one of the most important production factors, by creating and strengthening clean energy and also using technologies to be advanced, efficient, and environmentally friendly in the production process. Considering the positive effect of renewable energy consumption on the LCF index and its negative effect acton EF, it can be said that the increase in renewable energy consumption has reduced the ecological footprint and surpassed its biological capacity in Iran; Based on this, increasing the share of renewable energy can help improve the quality of the environment in the country.

Keywords

Subjects


1.     Aladejare, S.A., 2022. Natural resource rents, globalization and environmental degradation: New insight from 5 richest African economies. Resources Policy, 78(C). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102909
2.     Amer, E., Meyad, E.M., Meyad, A.M. and Mohsin, A.K.M., 2024a. Impacts of renewable and disaggregated non-renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions in GCC countries: A STIRPAT model analysis. Heliyon, 10(14). DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30154
3.     Amer, E., Meyad, E.M.A., Meyad, A.M. and Mohsin, A.K.M., 2024b. The impact of natural resources on environmental degradation: a review of ecological footprint and CO2 emissions as indicators. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1368125
4.     Becker, R., Enders, W. and Lee, J., 2006. A Stationarity Test in the Presence of an Unknown Number of Smooth Breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis. 27(3), 381-409.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-9892.2006.00478.x
5.     Cheng, K., Hsueh, H-P., Ranjbar, O., Wang, M-C. and Chang, T., 2021. Urbanization, coal consumption, and CO2 emissions nexus in China using bootstrap Fourier Granger causality test in quantiles. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 14(1), 31-49. doi:10.1007/s12076-020-00263-0
6.     Daliri, H., 2020. Relationship between ecological footprint and economic growth in D8 countries: Testing the Kuznets Environmental Hypothesis using PSTR model. The Journal of Economic Modeling Research, 11(39), 81-112. (In Persian with English Abstract).
7.     Danish, B.M.A., Mahmood, N. and Zhang, J.W., 2019. Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Science of the Total Environment, 678, 632-638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.02
8.     Dogan, A. and Pata, U.K., 2022. The role of ICT, R&D spending and renewable energy consumption on environmental quality: testing the LCC hypothesis for G7 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production. 380, 135038
9.     Du, J., Yang, X., Long, D. and Xin, Y., 2024. Modelling the influence of natural resources and social globalization on load capacity factor: New insights from the ASEAN countries, Resources Policy, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104816
10. Enders, W. and Jones, P., 2016. Grain Prices, Oil Prices, and Multiple Smooth Breaks in a VAR. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics. 20(4), 399-419. doi:10.1515/ snde-2014-0101
11. Erdogan, S., 2022. Linking natural resources and environmental sustainability: A panel data approach based on the load capacity curve hypothesis. Sustainable Development, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2836
12. Erdogan, S., 2024. On the impact of natural resources on environmental sustainability in African countries: A comparative approach based on the EKC and LCC hypotheses. Resources Policy, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104492
13. Fang, Z., Wang, T. and Yang, C., 2024. Nexus among natural resources, environmental sustainability, and political risk: Testing the load capacity factor curve hypothesis, Resources Policy, 90.
14. Faisal, F., Pervaiz, R., Ozatac, N. and Tursoy, T., 2021. Exploring the relationship between carbon dioxide emissions, urbanization, and financial deepening for Turkey using the symmetric and asymmetric causality approaches. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 23(12), 17374-17402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01385-1
15. Fareed, Z., Salem, S., Adebayo, T.S., Pata, U.K. and Shahzad, F., 2021. Role of Export Diversification and Renewable Energy on the Load Capacity Factor in Indonesia: A Fourier Quantile Causality Approach. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.770152
16. Feng, Q., Usman, M., Saqib, N. and Mentel, U., 2024. Modelling the contribution of green technologies, renewable energy, economic complexity, and human capital in environmental sustainability: Evidence from BRICS countries. Gondwana Research, 132, 168-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2024.04.010
17.  Fotros, M.H., Ferdousi, M. and Mehrpeyma, H., 2012. An Examination of Energy Intensity and Urbanization Effect on Environmental Degradation in Iran (A Cointegration Analysis). Journal of Environmental Studies, 37(60), 13-22. (In Persian with English Abstract).
18.  Gallant, A.R., 1981. On the bias in fexible functional forms and an essentially unbiased form: the Fourier flexible form. Journal of Econometrics. 15, 211-245.
19.  Golkhandan, A., 2023. Impact of Political Risk on Ecological Footprint in Iran: Multiple Asymmetric Thresholds NARDL (MATNARDL) Approach. Economic Policies and Research2(3), 114-148. (In Persian with English Abstract).
doi: 10.22034/jepr.2024.140960.1104
20.  Granger, C.W.J., 1969. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438. doi:10.2307/ 1912791
21.  Grossman, G.M. and Krueger, A.B., 1991. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement NBER.
22. Hatemi-J, A. and Uddin, G.S., 2012. Is the casual nexus of energy utilization and economic growth aymmetric in the US? Economic Systems, 36, 461-469.
23. Hosseini, A., Mohammadi, H., Ahmadpour, M. and Dehbashi, V., 2024. Investigating the short-term and long-term effects of factors affecting the quality of the environment in Iran. Journal of Environmental Science Studies, 9(3), 9138-9127. (In Persian with English Abstract). doi: 10.22034/jess.2023.381282.1955
24. Jin, G. and Huang, Z., 2023. Asymmetric impact of renewable electricity consumption and industrialization on environmental sustainability: Evidence through the lens of load capacity factor. Renewable Energy, 212, 514-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.05.045
25. Kazerouni, A., Asgharpour, H., Aghamohamadi, A. and Zokaei alamdari, E., 2019. Corruption and the environmental Kuznets Curve in developed and developing countries. The Journal of Economic Modeling Research, 10(37), 7-38. (In Persian with English Abstract).
26.  Khan, K., Zhang, J., Gul, F. and Li, T., 2022. The “carbon curse”: Understanding the relationship between resource abundance and emissions. The Extractive Industries and Society, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2022.101119
27.  Molaei, M., Besharat, E. and Mohammadi, M., 2020. Factors affecting the consumption of ecological resources in Iran using economic approach. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22(8), 377-388. (In Persian with English Abstract).
28.  Nazlioglu, S., Gormus, A. and Soytas, U., 2019. Oil Prices and Monetary Policy in Emerging Markets: Structural Shifts in Causal Linkages. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(1), 105–117. doi:10.1080/1540496x.2018.1434072
29.  Nazlioglu, S., Gormus, N.A. and Soytas, U., 2016. Oil prices and real estate investment trusts (REITs): Gradual-shift causality and volatility transmission analysis. Energy Economics. 60, 168-175.
doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.09.009
30.  Pahlavani, M., Dahbashi, M. and Moradi, E., 2014. The Effect of Trade Expansion and Economic Growth on Environmental Quality in Iran. Journal of Economic Research (Tahghighat- E- Eghtesadi), 49(3), 463-482. (In Persian with English Abstract). doi: 10.22059/jte.2014.52438
31.  Pata, U.K. and Ertugrul, H.M., 2023. Do the Kyoto Protocol, geopolitical risks, human capital and natural resources affect the sustainability limit? A new environmental approach based on the LCC hypothesis. Resources Policy, 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103352
32.  Pata, U.K. and Isik, C., 2021. Determinants of the load capacity factor in China: A novel dynamic ARDL approach for ecological footprint accounting. Resources Policy, 74(C). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102313
33.  Pata, U.K. and Pata, S.K., 2024. Determining the effectiveness of the forest load capacity factor in assisting decarbonization in India. Forest Policy and Economics, 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103281
34.  Pata, U.K. and Samour, A., 2022. Do renewable and nuclear energy enhance environmental quality in France? A new EKC approach with the load capacity factor. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104249
35.  Pata, U.K. and Tanriover, B., 2023. Is the load capacity curve hypothesis Valid for the top ten tourism destinations? Sustainability, 15(2), 960. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15020960
36.  Pata, U.K., Wang, Q., Kartal, M.T. and Sharif, A., 2024. The role of disaggregated renewable energy consumption on income and load capacity factor: A novel inclusive sustainable growth approach. Geoscience Frontiers. 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101693
37.  Roozitalab, A. and Hoseinpour, A., 2018. Exploring the causal relationship between effective environmental pollution factors in Iran from 1977 to 2015. Quarterly Journal of The Macro and Strategic Policies, 520), 20-40. (In Persian with English Abstract).
38.  Sarkodie, S.A., Adams, S. and Leirvik, T., 2020. Foreign direct investment and renewable energy in climate change mitigation: Does governance matter? Journal of Cleaner Production, 263(1).
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121262
39.  Sayehmiri, A. and Nazari, R., 2020. The impact of urbanization on environmental degradation in developing and developed countries, Journal of Environmental Science Studies5(1), 2244-2250. (In Persian with English Abstract).
40.  Siche, R., Pereira, L., Agostinho, F. and Ortega, E., 2010. Convergence of ecological footprint and emergy analysis as a sustainability indicator of countries: Peru as a case study. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 15(10), 3182-3192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.10.027
41.  Sun, A., Bao, K., Aslam, M., Gu, X., Khan, Z. and Uktamofv, K.F., 2023. Testing load capacity and environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for China: Evidence from novel dynamic autoregressive distributed lags model. Gondwana Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.07.018
42.  Tarazkar, M.H., Kargar Dehbidi, N. and Bakhshoodeh, M., 2018. The Effects of Economic Development and Urbanization on Pollution Emissions in Iran. Agricultural Economics Research, 10(38), 155-174. (In Persian with English Abstract).
43.  Toda, H.Y. and Yamamoto, T., 1995. Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1-2), 225-250.
doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01616-8
44.  Uche, E. and Ngepah, N., 2024. How green-technology, energy-transition, and resource rents influence load capacity factor in South Africa. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 43. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2023.2281038
45. Ulucak, R., Danish, and Ozcan, B., 2020. Relationship between energy consumption and environmental sustainability in OECD countries: The role of natural resources rents. Resources Policy, 69, 101803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101803
46. Uzar, U., 2024. The dynamic effect of income distribution, natural resources, and freedom of press on ecological footprint: Theory and empirical evidence for emerging economies. Resources Policy, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104682
47. Villanthenkodath, M.A. and Pal, S., 2024. Environmental degradation in geopolitical risk and uncertainty contexts for India: A comparison of ecological footprint, CO2 emissions, and load capacity factor, Energy and Climate Change, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2023.100122
48. Wang, W., Niu, Y., Gapich, A. and Strielkowski, W., 2023. Natural resources extractions and carbon neutrality: The role of geopolitical risk. Resources Policy, 83.
49. Zheng, S., Irfan, M., Ai, F. and Al-Faryan, M.A.S., 2023. Do renewable energy, urbanization, and natural resources enhance environmental quality in China? Evidence from novel bootstrap Fourier Granger causality in quantiles, Resources Policy, 81.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103354