1. Banihashemi, S.A., Khalilzadeh, M., Shahraki, A., Rostamy, M.M. and Ahmadizade, S. S., 2021. Optimizing the Environmental Impacts of the Construction Industry with Multi-Mode Activities: The Iranian Leopold Matrix Method. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 23(2 (105)), 161-175 [In Persian]. https://sid.ir/paper/958905/en
2. Borgheipour, H., Tehrani, G.M., Tehrani, N.A., Lomer, S.N., Esfahani, A.N. and Mohammadfam, I., 2019. Health Safety and Environmental Hazards of the Chlorination Unit of Combined Cycle Power Plants by Using HAZOP and Bow-Tie Methods. Occupational Hygiene and Health Promotion; 3 (2):134-145 [In Persian]. http://ohhp.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-200-fa.html
3. Ebadi, M., Khalilipour, O., Dadollahi Sohrab, A., Mohammad Asgari, H. and Khazaei, S.H., 2020. Environmental Impact assessment of Yard Vali-Asr Jetty using Leopold corrected matrix and RIAM matrix. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 18(4), pp.1-17.
4. Ersoy, N., 2021. Normalization procedures for Cocoso method: a comparative analysis under different scenarios. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(2), pp.217-234.
5. Hosseini, S.H., 2023. Investigating the environmental impacts of combined cycle power plants. The 7th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Information Technology papers [In Persian].
6. Hosseinian, H. and Nazari, M., 2017. Environmental impact assessment of gas power plants, including Shahid Mofateh Hamedan, and its lack of localization within the region in Iran. National Conference on the Vision 1420 and Technological Advances in Electrical Engineering, Computers, and Information Technology [In Persian].
7. Karyab, H., Ghanbari, R., Ranjbaran, M. and Taherkhani, A.M., 2020. Designing a tool to identify and prioritize the effects of construction and operation phases of combined cycle power plants on physical health. Iranian Journal of Health and Environment.13(3):385-408[In Persian].
8. Khalili, S., Tavakolinia, J., Mobarghei Dinan, N. and Soltaninejad, H., 2021. Environmental Impact Assessment of Large Commercial Complexes in Metropolises Using RIAM and EMP, Case Study of Arg Commercial Center. Motaleate Shahri, 10(39), 99-112[In Persian].
9. Kolios, A.J., Umofia, A. and Shafiee, M., 2017. Failure mode and effects analysis using a fuzzy-TOPSIS method: a case study of subsea control module. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, 7(1),29-53.
10. Krejcie, R.V. and Morgan, D.W., 1970. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
11. Malakutian, M. and Ghasemi Dehbakari, M., 2019. Investigating the environmental effects of Shubad Kahnuj Combined Cycle Power Plant, Journal of Contemporary Research in Science and Research, 2(20), 65-77[In Persian].
12. Mohammad Hosseini, N., Robati, M. and Amidpour, M., 2019. Environmental impact assessment of renewable power plants (solar-wind): a case study of Salafchegan special economic zone. Environmental Sciences, 17(4), pp.193-212 [In Persian].
13. Mohebali, S., Maghsoudy, S. and Doulati Ardejani, F., 2020. Inefficiencies of Traditional Environmental Impact Assessment Methods and Introducing Data Envelopment Analysis as a New Approach for EIA Based on Sustainable Development. Journal of Analytical and Numerical Methods in Mining Engineering, 10(24), pp.87-104.
14. Motahari, A., Dana, T., Kargari, N., Monavari, S.M. and Fard, N.J.H., 2024. Integrating life cycle assessment and health risk assessment of direct and indirect exposure (case study: A combined cycle power plant). Journal of Cleaner Production, 436, 140342.
15. Mousavi, S., Sotoude, A. and Azamizadeh, H., 2017. Environmental risk assessment of Yazd combined cycle power plant by William Fine method. The 4th Conference on Environmental Planning and Management, Tehran. [In Persian].
16. Nakhaeinejad, M. and Safari, M., 2019. Identification and ranking of technology risks in the field of natural gas energy distribution by the integrative approach of FMEA and TOPSIS The Case of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province Gas Company. Research in Production and Operations Management, 10(2),143-159[In Persian].
17. Pastakia, C.M. and Jensen, A., 1998. The rapid impact assessment matrix (Riam) For EIA. Environ Impact Assessment Review. 18(5), 461-482.
18. Pyramoon Consulting Co., 2016. Environmental assessment of Qeshm combined cycle power plant [In Persian].
19. Resen, E.J., Razzaq, M.S.A. and Abbood, H.Q., 2023. Environmental Impact Assessment for Industrial Organizations using Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix. Ecological Engineering and Environmental Technology 24(2): 94-108.
20. Shirali, G.A., Askaripoor, T., Kazemi, E., Azad, E.Z. and Marzban, M., 2014. Assessment and risks ranking in a combined cycle power plant using degree of Belief approach in fuzzy logic. Iran occupational health, 11(5):20-29 [In Persian]. http://ioh.iums.ac.ir/article-1-1159-fa.html
21. Strezov, V. and Cho, H.H., 2020. Environmental impact assessment from direct emissions of Australian thermal power generation technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270, 122515.
22. Tenney, A., Kværner, J. and Gjerstad, K.I., 2006. Uncertainty in environmental impact assessment predictions: the need for better communication and more transparency. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 24(1),45-56.
23. Torab, S. and Dashti, S., 2022. Risk Assessment of Health Safety and Environmental of Samangan Combined Cycle Power Plant using FMEA&SAW Integrated Model. Iranian Dam and Hydroelectric Powerplant; 8(31):16-28 [In Persian]. http://journal.hydropower.org.ir/article-1-461-fa.html
24. Wood, C., Dipper, B. and Jones, C., 2000. Auditing the assessment of the environmental impacts of planning projects. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management; 43(1): 23-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560010757
25. Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Kazimieras Zavadskas, E. and Turskis, Z., 2019. A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management decision, 57(9), 2501-2519
26. Yu, J., Ding, H., Yu, Y., Wu, S., Zeng, Q. and Xu, Y., 2024. Risk assessment of liquefied natural gas storage tank leakage using failure mode and effects analysis with Fermatean fuzzy sets and CoCoSo method. Applied Soft Computing, 154, 111334.
